Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


BTW, for those not watching, Dr. Orly's "Lightfoot v Bowen" is being re-submitted.

Separately, almost under the radar, "Keyes v Bowen" is still pending at the California Supreme Court.


1 posted on 12/18/2008 8:27:13 AM PST by BP2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: BP2; pissant

Ping


2 posted on 12/18/2008 8:29:22 AM PST by wastedyears ("Life's tough... It's even tougher if you're stupid." - John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE; LucyT; BonRad; ckilmer; hoosiermama; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; ...

ping


3 posted on 12/18/2008 8:30:39 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

thanks


4 posted on 12/18/2008 8:32:02 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

thanks


5 posted on 12/18/2008 8:32:02 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

thanks


6 posted on 12/18/2008 8:32:02 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

...surprised Essence would touch this...they’re a black interest magazine.


7 posted on 12/18/2008 8:32:10 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

8 posted on 12/18/2008 8:33:33 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

I saw the BC matter on the front page of a tabloid....something like ‘New of The Globe’ or one of those rags. Seems to me someone is trying to ‘cheapen’ and make this into a ‘conspiracy theory’. JMO.


9 posted on 12/18/2008 8:33:44 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

Surprising;y fair article.


11 posted on 12/18/2008 8:34:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2; ZULU; Clintonfatigued; romanesq; ladyvet; oswegodeee; freekitty; justiceseeker93; ...

Corruption thy name is Osama Obama!


13 posted on 12/18/2008 8:36:53 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

Zero will take the heat...He’s got more teflon on him than John Gotti ever did.


16 posted on 12/18/2008 8:40:07 AM PST by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2
If Obama could provide valid, legal proof of birth qualification, he would have. A long while back. He has spent untold sums of money and attorney hours SUPPRESSING any demand that he provide proof of his eligibility.

He is in no position to cause more concern about his being the president. So much dislike and anxiety about his ideology, his anti-American, criminal and terrorist associations, and his blatant arrogance based on an empty suit, have a growing number of Americans very concerned about his actual agenda for America.

Like ANY OTHER PERSON, he should be made to prove his eligibility. Just like you or I would have to.

17 posted on 12/18/2008 8:41:06 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

I could not have gotten a security clearance without a birth certificate and this POS does not need to produce on to become president.


18 posted on 12/18/2008 8:41:40 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

“If he was born in Hawaii, then he is a natural born citizen.”

Keyes needs to get that straightened out. This is why I think Obama has been doing the song and dance around not releasing his birth certificate. All the attention is being paid to where he was born, and while this does in fact have bearing on the requirement issue, it isn’t the only thing... Astroturfed into the office of the president of the united states.


23 posted on 12/18/2008 9:01:03 AM PST by nominal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2
Obama received dual citizenship since his father was a Kenyan-born national, which arguably doesn't qualify him as a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution.

Perfect in its simplicity.
25 posted on 12/18/2008 9:06:57 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2
Is that 12 are 15 posters it's heating up among!!!!LOL
26 posted on 12/18/2008 9:12:05 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

no article II? then no amendment 16...


28 posted on 12/18/2008 9:26:02 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

Good article. I predict by the time we reach the end of Obama’s first term, he will make Clinton look pristine. He’s sure off to a great start.


29 posted on 12/18/2008 9:33:10 AM PST by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2
Photobucket

30 posted on 12/18/2008 9:34:51 AM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2

The problem with this is that on Obama’s inauguration day (of January 20th), the Supreme Court will declare any of these cases moot and dismiss them all. That’s because on the Congress will have the ability to remove Obama from office (by impeachment and conviction). And we all know that a predominantly Democrat Congress will never do that (just look at Clinton...).

Also, since it’s a states rights issue in regards to any of the states and the Secretaries of State (and them vetting the candidates), I doubt the Supreme Court will intervene into that states rights issue.

The only solution is for people to correct the *defective vetting process* that allowed Obama to get into office the way he is, by passing state laws to require proof from a candidate before being placed on the ballot. That’s how this thing needs to be corrected.


34 posted on 12/18/2008 11:47:42 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson