Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controversy Over Obama's Eligibility For President Heats Up
Essence ^ | DECEMBER 8, 2008 | Cynthia Gordy

Posted on 12/18/2008 8:27:12 AM PST by BP2


Obama - Keyes

Obama - Keyes

See photos of other famous Black Republicans »

View photos of President-elect Barack Obama »

UPDATE: On Friday, the Supreme Court turned down the emergency appeal from the New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president.

The growing legal battle against President-elect Barack Obama's presidency is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court this week. The justices will decide whether or not to look into a lawsuit challenging Obama's citizenship. While the lawsuit is a continuation of a New Jersey case, the citizenship question has sparked a number of lawsuits from Obama's opponents.

Among those who have filed lawsuits is Alan Keyes, who ran an unsuccessful race against Barack Obama in 2004 for the Illinois Senate. Now, U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has taken an interest in the legal question and asked the rest of the bench to look into the case. Obama received dual citizenship since his father was a Kenyan-born national, which arguably doesn't qualify him as a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution.

A petition to stop the Electoral College from confirming Obama as the forty-fourth President of the United States on December 15 has already been rejected by Justice David Souter, but in a rare move, Thomas has stepped in and granted the case time before the high court in a conference scheduled for Friday.

ESSENCE.com spoke to Keyes about why he's challenging Obama's citizenship and if this whole lawsuit is just an overblown case of sour grapes.

ESSENCE.COM: What exactly do you want to accomplish with this lawsuit?
ALAN KEYES: I had read a little bit about the issues that were being raised about Obama back during the primary season. At first I thought, like a lot of people, "There's nothing to this. It's just a matter of fact. You can establish what the facts are." The Constitution specifies that a citizen who is naturalized, rather than born into the status of being an American citizen, cannot be president. That was done in the beginning because people feared a foreign takeover of the United States government by the process of immigration. Staid as it is, we again are in a situation where a lot of foreign entities have influence or control over U.S. policy.

The reason an issue has been raised about Obama is because of the simple question, which can be answered with a birth certificate that shows he was born in the United States, or born to parents who had the capacity to transmit U.S. citizenship. When the question was asked, he danced around it. If the most important office of the federal government can be occupied by someone who is not qualified under the United States Constitution, that destroys the authority of the Constitution. I think it's something that needs to be dealt with in a clear, straightforward way. Eventually the case will get to the Supreme Court, establish the facts, and clear the air. It's really all very simple.

ESSENCE.COM: The Obama campaign responded to these questions months ago by posting a birth certificate on his campaign Web site, showing that he was born in Hawaii.
KEYES:
A lot of questions have been raised about what they posted. It has to be established by a matter of fact, not by some Web site. The state of Hawaii needs to share the birth certificate with the Supreme Court, so they can take a look at it. When I went into the government as part of the United States foreign service, you had to submit an original copy of your birth certificate. People have been dancing around Obama's certification instead of going straight to the answer.

ESSENCE.COM: What's wrong with the birth certificate on his Web site?
KEYES:
Part of the problem is, at the time he was born, the state of Hawaii was issuing certificates of live birth. That's what he has on the Web site. They would issue that certificate verifying you were born, but not necessarily in the United States. And there is question that, at the time that he was born, his mother was not yet of age to transmit citizenship. You had to be 19, I think. If he was born in Hawaii, then he is a natural born citizen. If he was born somewhere else-and a question has been raised if his birth was in Kenya-then his mother would not have transmitted citizenship. One needs to verify that the certificate verifies the birthplace.

ESSENCE.COM: State officials from the health department of Hawaii have verified that they have Obama's birth records, and that he was indeed born in Hawaii. Do you think they're lying?
KEYES:
I don't think anything. Just let it be verified. This is not something that should be taken on hearsay. This is the most important office. Everything should be done without controversy, in such a way that the Constitutional requirements are met. If something is contrary to the Constitutional requirement, then you have to do away with that. It's not on Obama to do this. The folks with whom this burden presently rests are the officials who are now responsible for the process, who sit on the Supreme Court and other areas. They have to abide by their oaths to preserve and defend the Constitution, and not have him entering into office with a question they refuse to resolve.

ESSENCE.COM: Why didn't you bring this up earlier, during the campaign? Why wait until two months before the inauguration?
KEYES:
The election is the time when the people make the judgment, not government officials. The problem in this case is, Obama was not properly vetted-by the media, or other individuals-during the campaign. They refused to look at it. People went to the polls with the issue unresolved. Once the electoral process is done, then the responsibility for certifying the results and making sure it's all according to the Constitution rests on the officials. So we're at a different stage of the process. I don't believe it would be a good idea to turn to the government to establish the qualifications of people who are running for office. That could be abused to limit the options of the people. If people are behaving with integrity, these facts would come out and then people would be able to make their judgment. This didn't happen.

ESSENCE.COM: To a lot of people, your lawsuit looks like a case of sour grapes because you lost. Your response?
KEYES:
I think politics is irrelevant to this, actually. I don't see how it is showing fondness for Barack Obama to let him enter into office with a question that could be raised. He should not have to operate under that burden. I think the officials need to clear the air for his sake. From my point of view, it is a bad idea to have a president of the United States enter office with a cloud hanging over his head, where every time he tries to do something, he would end up frittering away time because of that objection. So let's get it over with. Let's resolve it and move forward with a clear an undisturbed mandate for the new president.

ESSENCE.COM: For argument's sake, let's say Obama is only a naturalized citizen, and was raised by Americans and grew up in the United States. What difference does that make to you?
KEYES:
It makes a difference to the Constitution. The Constitution has to be obeyed. If we get into a position where it is somehow regarded as dispensable then this country will fall apart. Black people should be the first folks to remember that. Without adherence to the Constitution our battles would have never been won. I don't want to live in a country where we are suddenly back in a world where the force of majority rules. I don't think any of us do.

ESSENCE.COM: Would you be in support of amending that section of the Constitution?
KEYES:
No, I would most certainly not. Today we are in more danger as a people of being subverted by foreign powers than we were when it was founded. It is possible, under our present rules in America, for folks from another country to come visit America, to have a child here, to take that child back to wherever, raise that child there, and that child would be an American citizen. Do we really think it would be right to have a person who has not lived in America, does not identify with our people, to run here as president of the United States?

ESSENCE.COM: That's a different situation from what's being questioned about Barack Obama.
KEYES:
Rules have to be written in general. You can't write a rule in every particular case. The rules established in the Constitution are general rules that have been abided by people throughout the history of this country. People have been excluded from running for president, people like Arnold Schwarzenegger. One has to think of the common good. This isn't a question of individuals anymore. The key thing about the presidency, in my opinion, is that the person above all takes responsibility for the common good of the country. Our public officials do not swear allegiance to a country; they swear an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. That's something to be taken very seriously. Those are the rules.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 1600penn; birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: STONEWALLS

“...surprised Essence would touch this...they’re a black interest magazine.”

Maybe that is EXACTLY why they touched this?

If/when the truth about who BHO really is and what he is about can no longer be denied, there are a whole bunch of jilted old guard folks who really DID “live the struggle” who are going to be in a position to extract their just due.

I see this as a drawing of lines and marshalling of forces. Zed does not have the lineage, pedigree, and a history of dutiful loyalty to “his people” and “the cause.” When his selfish delusions of grandeur and lust for power finally bring him down, he will have set The Movement back decades if not more and the real leaders among his “proclaimed” people know it.

BHO is all about POWER, not equality. “HIS power onto (NOT unto) them, not equality for (as in among) them.”


21 posted on 12/18/2008 8:53:45 AM PST by shoutingandpointing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat; RushIsMyTeddyBear; iopscusa

“Good news! This is not a black or white issue. It is an AMERICAN ISSUE”

...you’re right of course....but considering their readership voted overwhelmingly for BHO, I was startled that they would touch anything that would question his legitimacy....more power to ‘em.


22 posted on 12/18/2008 8:55:09 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BP2

“If he was born in Hawaii, then he is a natural born citizen.”

Keyes needs to get that straightened out. This is why I think Obama has been doing the song and dance around not releasing his birth certificate. All the attention is being paid to where he was born, and while this does in fact have bearing on the requirement issue, it isn’t the only thing... Astroturfed into the office of the president of the united states.


23 posted on 12/18/2008 9:01:03 AM PST by nominal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Yes, the BC story was on the front page of Globe Magazine, a supermarket tabloid. Remember that supermarket tabloid stories aren't all phony. There have been occasions when they have had more courage than the MSM to break scandal stories about Democrats.
24 posted on 12/18/2008 9:05:56 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Obama received dual citizenship since his father was a Kenyan-born national, which arguably doesn't qualify him as a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution.

Perfect in its simplicity.
25 posted on 12/18/2008 9:06:57 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Is that 12 are 15 posters it's heating up among!!!!LOL
26 posted on 12/18/2008 9:12:05 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah

“Zero will take the heat...He’s got more teflon on him than John Gotti ever did.”

**

Teflon coated comes with a warning.. Extreme heat damages and metal knives damage. Plastic MSM are helping to preserve his non stick surface.

Time to turn up the heat and long metal knives.


27 posted on 12/18/2008 9:22:32 AM PST by Blu By U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BP2

no article II? then no amendment 16...


28 posted on 12/18/2008 9:26:02 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Good article. I predict by the time we reach the end of Obama’s first term, he will make Clinton look pristine. He’s sure off to a great start.


29 posted on 12/18/2008 9:33:10 AM PST by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Photobucket

30 posted on 12/18/2008 9:34:51 AM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

“...surprised Essence would touch this...they’re a black interest magazine.”

Its not a black issue!


31 posted on 12/18/2008 9:37:51 AM PST by Sorry screen name in use
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

It sure is.


32 posted on 12/18/2008 10:51:10 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nominal
“If he was born in Hawaii, then he is a natural born citizen.”

Not what this guy says . . .

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

" ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..."

And check out that "not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty" part. Obama's father was a foreigner, a British subject.

And, Obama admits he was a British subject for 21 years on his own campaign website. He owed allegiance to a foreign sovereign and says so himself.

Obama is a citizen of the United States, but he has never, ever, been a "natural born citizen."

33 posted on 12/18/2008 11:13:40 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BP2

The problem with this is that on Obama’s inauguration day (of January 20th), the Supreme Court will declare any of these cases moot and dismiss them all. That’s because on the Congress will have the ability to remove Obama from office (by impeachment and conviction). And we all know that a predominantly Democrat Congress will never do that (just look at Clinton...).

Also, since it’s a states rights issue in regards to any of the states and the Secretaries of State (and them vetting the candidates), I doubt the Supreme Court will intervene into that states rights issue.

The only solution is for people to correct the *defective vetting process* that allowed Obama to get into office the way he is, by passing state laws to require proof from a candidate before being placed on the ballot. That’s how this thing needs to be corrected.


34 posted on 12/18/2008 11:47:42 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

I know. Keyes needs to see this stuff asap. Too bad he didn’t have this for the interview.


35 posted on 12/18/2008 12:07:33 PM PST by nominal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nominal
Keyes needs to see this stuff asap.

His legal team has this information.
36 posted on 12/18/2008 1:02:08 PM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: All
I have responded to well over 100 posts from well-meaning, and some not-so-well-meaning, FReepers' questions and challenges about what a "natural born citizen" is and isn't.

I will respond to no more posts on this subject.

The information I have is at The Natural Born Citizen Chart. It is not MY opinion. I didn't pull it out of the ether or anywhere else. The information on this page was provided by three attorneys and edited into a single page. They all practice in the federal courts system and they agree on the caselaw and precedent. Read it carefully and make sure to read the caselaw, especially those sections that are highlighted.

If you have a different opinion, fine. That's your prerogative (tip of the hat to the "natural born citizen," Bobby Brown).
37 posted on 12/18/2008 1:20:20 PM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Did you not get the memo about there being two Americas
in the DNC- and MSM-controlled USA?
:::::::::
Yes it is Animal Farm....but I for one am not going to let a handful of Chicago street thug styled socialists tear up country. I don’t care what the MSM and its socialist party do to America in the short term — the Constitution will stand, freedom will stand....


38 posted on 12/18/2008 5:37:48 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BP2

obumpa


39 posted on 12/18/2008 7:42:29 PM PST by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

I concur. At best he is a “citizen of the United States” by birth assuming he was born in Hawaii. He’s falls well short of the natural allegiance required of a natural-born citizen.


40 posted on 12/18/2008 8:57:37 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson