Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

I agree with your post below for the most part.

I am not in favor of more government involvement in ANYTHING, but at the same time, Republicans have to offer solutions instead of just saying Government =bad. I applaud Jindal for his effort.


21 posted on 12/17/2008 5:17:55 PM PST by IMissPresidentReagan (I'd rather be a conservative nut job than a liberal with no nuts and no job. www.reaganaction.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IMissPresidentReagan

yes, Jindal gets points for effort.

That said, the plan is semi-socialization the more I think about it. The patient retains a limited choice in terms of doctors and facilities but the treating professionals have none.

If a physician is forced to take on a patient and payment is outcome based, there is little incentive to treat high acuity, time consuming patients with poor prognosis. It is more profitable to treat large numbers of healthy people. You will see the same problems in a different form that this plan wants to solve (access to care and quality of care) and an increase in passive euthanasia.

It’s a pyramid scheme like the HMOs.


23 posted on 12/17/2008 5:27:02 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson