To: 2ndDivisionVet
The 1950’s weren’t so bad, my friend.
4 posted on
12/16/2008 9:44:06 AM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(I would continue my rant but I have to make sure my tires are inflated.)
To: Former Proud Canadian
Having been born in 1960, I will have to take your word for it (missed them by 35 days!) However, it’s not the 1950’s anymore.
8 posted on
12/16/2008 9:45:58 AM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
To: Former Proud Canadian; 2ndDivisionVet
The 1950’s weren’t so bad, my friend.Depends on what color your skin was.
15 posted on
12/16/2008 9:53:17 AM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Former Proud Canadian
“The 1950’s weren’t so bad, my friend.”
You bet. I’m sure glad to have lived then. What fun and personal growth.
29 posted on
12/16/2008 10:00:52 AM PST by
billhilly
(Sayonara Detroit)
To: Former Proud Canadian
Read the thread, don’t waste my time... Social issues aside, Pat is stuck in the 1950's, economically. The economic conditions that existed post WWII that allowed someone with a high school education to get a job at an auto plant that would support their family and take them to retirement are gone. The world changed and we can't undo the changes by passing a few laws.
47 posted on
12/16/2008 10:07:19 AM PST by
Citizen Blade
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: Former Proud Canadian
1950’s were not great. Alot of child abuse (hidden) wife beating (hidden) and a lot of other unspeakable stuff.
To: Former Proud Canadian
The 1950’s weren’t so bad The GM of the 50's is not the GM of today. If the UAW were in the railroad industry, we'd be looking a bailing out steam engine production.
71 posted on
12/16/2008 10:16:53 AM PST by
tbpiper
(Now irate and tireless, but mostly irate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson