Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Buchanan: The Toyota Republicans
Human Events ^ | December 16, 2008 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 12/16/2008 9:41:55 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-289 next last
To: Thorin
And Pat can still turn a phrase. “Toyota Republicans”—what a great line.

Are you talking about the sam Pat Buchannan who arrived at a Detroit rally when he was running for president in a Mercedes?????

101 posted on 12/16/2008 10:33:05 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“Depends on what color your skin was.”

The 1950s still were not so bad. While my wife was a little girl in the Soviet Union she would cry about how badly Blacks were treated in the United States. But Blacks had more civile rights in the Jim Crow South than Soviet high Communist Party members had.

Blacks in the 1950 South were free to...

1. Leave the South to seek opportunity elsewhere (many did)
2. Own their own homes and land with low property taxes (many did)
3. Own guns to protect their lives and property (many did)
4. Attend Southern medical schools for Blacks (many did and the first Black female had already been accepted to the University of Arkansas Medical School)
5. Attend any of a great number of colleges (many did)
6. Vote in multi-party elections (many did)

Take your skin color comments back to Russia.


102 posted on 12/16/2008 10:33:18 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

14 billion here, 14 billion there, soon you’re talking some real money. Anyway, isn’t this just the first payment?


103 posted on 12/16/2008 10:34:42 AM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
Lets see, our government has illegally imported tens of millions of low wage workers into the U.S., while at the same time applauding as hundreds of thousands of our jobs and entire corporations move off shore to gain even lower wage peasant labor....Were on the verge of a depression, our government is so corrupted they now control banking and all of our major industries...

Yup, this global economy has worked out really great for America.

Pat Buchanan is a stupid Hitler apologist.

Not only that, he has the gall to defend America. We should jail him for speaking out!

104 posted on 12/16/2008 10:36:24 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

The same ones that look at the 1950s with disdain, while trying to convince the easily led that what we have now in America is somehow a good thing.


Yes, the 50’s were a strong time for American economics...the economy grew....and grew by manufacturing and creating jobs in America....not shipping those things overseas...

While at the same time the European economy was finally expanding after the war...esp the German Economic Miracle...done by lowering business taxes AND not shipping manufacturing overseas


105 posted on 12/16/2008 10:36:57 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Always question the patriotism of any Globalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Reagan was close to Japan, while the Bushes were close to China

Buchanan didn't have any problem running over with Nixon and Kissinger to China and help drag them into the 20th century
106 posted on 12/16/2008 10:37:20 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

They’ll still be good jobs without the UAW, Pat.


107 posted on 12/16/2008 10:37:37 AM PST by Dionysius (Jingoism is no vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This morning Pat was showing his love for Caroline Kennedy.

Blech


108 posted on 12/16/2008 10:38:28 AM PST by Carley (Prayers for Sgt. Eddie Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Chrysler repaid it’s loan.


109 posted on 12/16/2008 10:39:21 AM PST by Carley (Prayers for Sgt. Eddie Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
People,

WE are not shutting down Detroit. The car manufacturers and the Unions in Detroit are. They made their bed and we are supposed to sleep in it? No, our children are supposed to sleep in it? We are borrowing our children's money to bail out businesses and Unions that only had their short term interests in mind.

This does not come down on the people who are against the bail out. This goes on all those involved in the process of rotting these businesses from within.

110 posted on 12/16/2008 10:40:09 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. - One of General Abram's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Oliver Wendell Holmes phrased it a little differently: ‘Freedom of Speech doesn’t give one the right to runn into a crowded theatre and yell “Fire!” when there isn’t one.”

Hopw on earth is that applicable? If you figure that leaving international trade to its own devices, as we do with interstate trade for instance, would result in the equivalent of panic and suffocation, then you don’t believe in the free market. Let me say this right now, I think America’s history of tariff’s specifically and protectionism generally is shameful. I’m sure we would have been better off without it.

But alas, we are stuck thinking of foreigners as our enemies. In the eyes of some it is not enough that people from two different nations mutually benefit from trade. One country must win, and one must lose. It doesn’t have to be that way, though. All we have to care about is ourselves. Leave the rest of the world to its own concerns. And don’t get me wrong, China might think itself our enemy. It may actually be our enemy at some point, but not until it acts overtly, in my opinion. If in the meantime we subsidize its aggrandizement, so be it. At least we got something in return for it.


111 posted on 12/16/2008 10:41:04 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

It was just an analogy to why we need manufacturing plants. I know what they fly now. And if you read my other post you will see that Ford makes a good product. You are out of touch with what goes on with Ford and G.M.

GM out sold Toyota by about 1.2 million vehicles in the U.S. and Ford outsold Honda by 850,000 and Nissan by 1.2 million in the U.S. GM was the world’s No. 1 automaker beating Toyota by 3,000 units.

did you realize that Chevy makes the Malibu and Ford makes the Fusion that were both rated over the Camry and Accord by J.D. Power independent survey on initial quality? Did you bother to read the Consumer Report that rated Ford on par with good Japanese auto makers.

Did you realize Big Three’s gas guzzlers include the 33 mpg Malibu that beats the Accord. And for ‘09 Ford introduces the Hybrid Fusion whose 39 mpg is the best midsize, beating the Camry Hybrid. Ford’s Focus beats the Corolla and Chevy’s Cobalt beats the Civic.

Did you realize that both GM and Ford offer more hybrid models than Nissan or Honda. Between 2005 and 2007, Ford alone has invested more than $22 billion in research and development of technologies such as Eco Boost, flex fuel, clean diesel, hybrids, plug in hybrids and hydrogen cars.


112 posted on 12/16/2008 10:42:23 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“Were on the verge of a depression, our government is so corrupted they now control banking”

What do you mean “now”? Where have you been for the last century?


113 posted on 12/16/2008 10:42:34 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
Don't be afraid. Ford and Chrysler will be OK in the long run. GM on the other hand, I am not so sure about.

Ford already said they are OK and they really don't need a bailout. I am sticking to my guns and holding my position. And the good things is, I aint the one who is scared.

Another thing that I know that calms me down is that we are Americans and we will adapt, improvise, and overcome.

114 posted on 12/16/2008 10:45:37 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. - One of General Abram's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

the UAW is NOT America!!


115 posted on 12/16/2008 10:47:42 AM PST by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
And, unlike Mitsubishi, General Motors didn't bomb Pearl Harbor.

Sigh... and the British bombed and burnt the White house in 1812 while the French supported the US war of independence. And the Japanese fought on the side of the allies in WWI
116 posted on 12/16/2008 10:52:28 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smallbiz

Uaw pearl harbored us with obama support.


117 posted on 12/16/2008 10:52:41 AM PST by omega4179 ( Those who can't write, write the news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24
Take your skin color comments back to Russia.

Native Texan, not Russian, so try again.

No FR "discussion" is complete without a Luv-it-or-leave-it flip-off, eh?

118 posted on 12/16/2008 10:53:41 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

Where in the Bible is it mandated that cars have to be made in Detroit?


119 posted on 12/16/2008 10:54:29 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

“America faces nationalistic trade rivals who manipulate currencies, employ nontariff barriers, subsidize their manufacturers, rebate value-added taxes on exports to us and impose value-added taxes on imports from us, all to capture our markets and kill our great companies.”

Is this true? If so, that’s not exactly ‘free trade’, is it?


The real problem with “Free Trade” is that no one really practices it...except liberal Free Traders in this country.

Such nuttiness is killing the US economy


120 posted on 12/16/2008 10:55:28 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Always question the patriotism of any Globalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-289 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson