To: Still Thinking
Yes, the second half of the second sentence doesn't make sense.
So far we have exchanged several posts and you have presented nothing that indicates Roosevelt engaged in a ponzi scheme. I asume you're still thinking about it.
64 posted on
12/16/2008 2:47:40 PM PST by
nufsed
To: nufsed
I certainly have. Repeatedly. In small words. Perhaps our definitions of Ponzi schemes differ. I’m not going to bother responding to any more posts.
65 posted on
12/16/2008 2:49:41 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: nufsed
Ah. I see what you mean about the unclarity. I mean to say that the revolving door funding scheme made it a Ponzi scheme whether or not the funds were kept segregated.
67 posted on
12/16/2008 2:52:26 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: nufsed
I haven’t posted any non supportable comments. The logic is perfectly clear, especially after having been repeated in three slightly different ways. Perhaps you should read them again. Good day.
68 posted on
12/16/2008 2:53:48 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson