Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
Yes, the second half of the second sentence doesn't make sense.

So far we have exchanged several posts and you have presented nothing that indicates Roosevelt engaged in a ponzi scheme. I asume you're still thinking about it.

64 posted on 12/16/2008 2:47:40 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: nufsed

I certainly have. Repeatedly. In small words. Perhaps our definitions of Ponzi schemes differ. I’m not going to bother responding to any more posts.


65 posted on 12/16/2008 2:49:41 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: nufsed
Ah. I see what you mean about the unclarity. I mean to say that the revolving door funding scheme made it a Ponzi scheme whether or not the funds were kept segregated.
67 posted on 12/16/2008 2:52:26 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: nufsed

I haven’t posted any non supportable comments. The logic is perfectly clear, especially after having been repeated in three slightly different ways. Perhaps you should read them again. Good day.


68 posted on 12/16/2008 2:53:48 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson