Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed
Ah. I see what you mean about the unclarity. I mean to say that the revolving door funding scheme made it a Ponzi scheme whether or not the funds were kept segregated.
67 posted on 12/16/2008 2:52:26 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
I thought you left?

Still unsupportable. What is a revolving door funding scheme and what does that have to do with anything?

As for your comment that a separate fund means it was still a ponzi scheme. Please support that with facts and not your LOGIC, since everything I've read for the last ten years says that if the fund were left alone it would have been okay.

Here's your opportunity to come clean. Just say these words and I'll move on. "I bought into lazy thinking and what I heard on the radio and saw here. I thought it would be cute to post an anti-Roosevelt reply because everyone here knows what a bad guy he was. I thought I'd get away with it and no one would challenge me. I'm sorry."

70 posted on 12/16/2008 3:05:15 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson