Skip to comments.
Bullet Serialization Threat in Georgia
Email From National Shooting Sports Foundation ^
| 11/15/08
| unknown
Posted on 12/15/2008 9:47:06 AM PST by epow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: epow
HERE is the official Ramsey bio, a typical ultra-liberal Democrat representing a metro Atlanta district where crime is high and where many of the crime weary residents have the totally mistaken idea that more gun control is the answer. If you're a GA voter let your state Senator and Assemblyman know what you want done in re this proposed bill.
21
posted on
12/15/2008 10:10:01 AM PST
by
epow
(Somewhere in Kenya a village is feeling proud of one of it's native-born sons.)
To: epow
A ban on ammo is essentially a ban on the right to bear firearms.
If we can’t load them then they just become clubs and projectiles.
22
posted on
12/15/2008 10:10:37 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
To: domenad
Can someone more knowledgeable about gun law explain why this is a problem? Is it too expensive, or so infeasible as to ban many weapons? Im a firm believer in the 2nd amendment. Im also a firm believer in giving law enforcement the tools it needs to fight crime.
This is all because some wacko in Seattle Washington has a patent on the process. He invested 200,000 in this. He has the patent not the applied technology. He can't sell it any way except to make this required by the govt.
It sounds very good on the surface, but once you dig deeper it is BS. This is just another backdoor way around the Constitution.
If you want to give law enforcement the tools, look at consequences, not intent.
23
posted on
12/15/2008 10:14:34 AM PST
by
PeterPrinciple
( Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: domenad
Expensive, in the first place. Many of us also make our own bullets and reload cases. This would become next to impossible if not illegal.
24
posted on
12/15/2008 10:14:51 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: DBrow
Get caught with an unserialized projectile, go to jail. Then let the revolution begin.
25
posted on
12/15/2008 10:16:12 AM PST
by
MahatmaGandu
(Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
When junk like this gets passed (I know it hasn’t passed and probably wont for now) but when it does, we need governors and other politicians to say, “The legislator is our of hand, the people of _____ should in no way attempt to keep this ‘Law’”.
Of course, he could just veto the bill and save his words. How do I say this? I trying to say that local conservative leaders should fight harder for the constitutional rights of it’s constituents to the point of advocating disobedience to tyranny.
26
posted on
12/15/2008 10:19:26 AM PST
by
demshateGod
(the GOP is dead to me)
To: epow
How will they put serial numbers on my 20 gauge bird and buck shot?
27
posted on
12/15/2008 10:22:50 AM PST
by
Pfesser
To: Myrddin
I think we’ll see ammo-swaps. Put a thousand rounds into the bucket and pull out a random 1000 rounds. Somebody will come up with a machine to do the counting for you, just like those change machines at the grocery stores.
28
posted on
12/15/2008 10:26:09 AM PST
by
gitmo
(I am the latte-sipping, NYT-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, PC, arrogant liberal. -BO)
To: domenad
To: t1b8zs
They try that and all hell is going to break loose.
30
posted on
12/15/2008 10:36:39 AM PST
by
KellyM37
To: SWAMPSNIPER
How is serializing going to actually work since bullets tend to fragment when they enter a body ... ?
To: Myrddin
A company called "Ammunition Accountability" is pushing a law in multiple states to force the adoption of their ammunition labeling technology.
The "company" needs to be put out of business.
32
posted on
12/15/2008 10:40:25 AM PST
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: gitmo
Excellent idea. Or, if they serialize the rounds, I plan to buy a lot, wait an hour and then call the police to report them stolen.
33
posted on
12/15/2008 10:41:39 AM PST
by
PrairieRoot
(Here's hoping Global Warning extends the hunting and logging seasons.)
To: Jackson57
It isn’t intended to solve crime, it is intended to chip away at gun rights. There may be some well intentioned fools involved, but the forces really behind gun control actually encourage crime, it empowers them.
34
posted on
12/15/2008 10:43:32 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: domenad
Im also a firm believer in giving law enforcement the tools it needs to fight crime.
And I'm a firmer believer in securing people from unreasonable search and seizure, which serialization of ammunition is. The last clause of the 2nd Amendment is 'shall not be infringed'. What exactly do you think 'infringed' means?
35
posted on
12/15/2008 10:44:23 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(I shall give their President the same respect they gave mine.)
To: epow
They’ll get my unmarked ammunition back the hard way...
36
posted on
12/15/2008 10:45:52 AM PST
by
Edgerunner
(Second Amendment Spoken Here)
To: Edgerunner
Theyll get my unmarked ammunition back the hard way...
Molon Labe. This is one law that a freedom loving citizen is under no obligation to obey.
37
posted on
12/15/2008 10:51:14 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(I shall give their President the same respect they gave mine.)
To: stevio
Is it too expensive, or so infeasible as to ban many weapons?
In a word, "yea".
If I may add my 02 cents. One of the primary reasons for amendment 2 was that the citizens may, some day, need to protect themselves from out of control government. Serialization of bullets would aid an out-of-control government to track down the patriots and quicly stamp out dissent.
38
posted on
12/15/2008 10:56:22 AM PST
by
suijuris
To: suijuris
I don’t disagree they have that in the back of their collective minds. In the meantime, it’s a major, costly, PITA!
39
posted on
12/15/2008 11:02:51 AM PST
by
stevio
(Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
To: hoosierham; domenad
Please don't tell me "if you are doing nothing wrong,it won't matter";you do realize there are so many laws and regulations that it is already humanly impossible to be in complete compliance? This is a very good point. Also consider 'doing nothing wrong' very much depends on who's defining 'wrong'. As an example, saying something against homosexuality, biblicly based or not, may criminally 'wrong' as it is in Canada.
40
posted on
12/15/2008 11:02:51 AM PST
by
tbpiper
(Now irate and tireless, but mostly irate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson