[GonzoII]

Prolife Ping.

[DiogenesLaertius]

People narrowly bracket and can only focus on a certain number of things at once. Rememeber, McCain was basically tied with Obama before the financial crisis in an environment where the Republican party was at its weakest since Watergate (yes, even before the financial crisis). People put the economy first by large margins in polling on election day. In a normal year, social issues would’ve had more precedence.

[wagglebee]

Pinged from Terri Dailies

[cpforlife.org]

In this context, the number that matters most is the number of people who actually care enough to find out the candidates positions and then vote pro-life as the number one priority EVERY election - no matter what.

It obviously is not greater than the 46% McRINO got against 0bama.

Factor in if McLooser had not picked Sarah. He would have lost at least a few million more votes. THAT number would more accurately identify the solidly committed pro-life & trad values voter. 40 - 43 percent or so?

There were many people who claim to be pro-life that voted for the ghoul 0bama. It is not possible that many of them were unaware of the Candidate’s/Party’s position.

These are PLINOs Pro-Life in Name Only.

The primary system is corrupted and designed to favor libs. Until that changes it will be very tough to have a Sarah Palin type conservatve win the nomination.

I'm curious if any one has a take on this.

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

[TAdams8591]

Unfortunately, it isn’t those 66% who make the laws.