Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EagleUSA
Could somebody please explain the sudden urgency to eliminate our second amendment rights? I realize that the underlying reason is for the Socialists to attain even more power. But what is the stated justification for this? A few shootings here and there? Make them explain WHY they are trampling on a fundamental part of the Constitution? Make them explain WHY they are trampling on a fundamental part of the Constitution?
16 posted on 12/15/2008 8:16:57 AM PST by Girdyourloins (Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy Thomas J. [Stonewall] Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Girdyourloins
Make them explain WHY they are trampling on a fundamental part of the Constitution?

Okay. You first.

18 posted on 12/15/2008 8:26:58 AM PST by Misterioso ( Socialism is an ideology. Capitalism is a natural phenomenon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

Silly, because they CAN.


19 posted on 12/15/2008 8:27:04 AM PST by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

They cannot initiate the Obamstitution without cancelling the resistance clauses of the Constitution.

The urgency is securing ultimate power over the people with a monarchy of elitists.


21 posted on 12/15/2008 8:55:35 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

Why? Because they’re going to push for Maoist/Mussolini/NAZI/USSR/Castro style fascism. They’re going to kill the dissenters (that being us) en masse, as fascists always do, and they need us disarmed to facilitate the process. That’s why the sudden urgency. History people, history.


23 posted on 12/15/2008 9:09:36 AM PST by Trod Upon (The Left killed my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

Make them explain WHY they are trampling on a fundamental part of the Constitution?
:::::::::
You basically answered your own question. They want to neutralize the Second Amendment for the EXACT REASON it was included in the Bill of Rights. The right to armed protection of the citizens from a corrupt-oppressive government.

That is all they are worried about. They KNOW that criminals do not obey laws (they look in the mirror). They know their only defense is to disarm the LAW ABIDING citizen is necessary for their radical socialist agenda.

Review the rise of Hitler in Germany. See what he did to neutralize the threat of Germany’s people being armed -— and look at the huge mistake that countries he overran, made BEFORE he just walked in a took over their lives.....

History does try and repeat itself.


32 posted on 12/15/2008 11:10:24 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

Quite simply once Obama takes away your guns you will be completely defenseless from his ‘civilian army’. Think of Hitler vs those who he put in concentration and death camps and I think you’ll get the idea.


38 posted on 12/15/2008 2:21:47 PM PST by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins

Whether we realize it or not, the election was a coup d’état by the socialists/communists. Hitler said it best:

“The most foolish mistake we would possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” —Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.


44 posted on 12/15/2008 7:32:57 PM PST by A. Patriot (CZ 52's ROCK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girdyourloins
Make them explain WHY they are trampling on a fundamental part of the Constitution?

It's for your own good. Now eat your peas.

51 posted on 12/16/2008 10:24:03 AM PST by gundog (When the SHTF, it will not be evenly distributed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson