Hat tip to FReeper Verginius Rufus for finding this article. It is a very good read. I was too lazy to post this last night.
To: Verginius Rufus
/posted the article you mentioned.
To: happinesswithoutpeace
Why does the author talk about “classical liberalism” and “the left” as if they’re polar opposites?
3 posted on
12/14/2008 9:50:56 AM PST by
lainie
(The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
To: happinesswithoutpeace
A fantastic article. Worth reading here, too, in the time of Washington gone made.
4 posted on
12/14/2008 9:54:10 AM PST by
tanuki
(Summum ius summa injuria. (The more law, the less justice))
To: happinesswithoutpeace
...the party has over the years purged from its ranks all voices of classical liberalism and has explicitly rejected values-based narratives in favor of an ill-defined pragmatism. This has proved no match for the ideological assault by the left, which ended up monopolizing the marketplace of ideas in the universities and the other educational establishments of the country.
"The fall of Rome," wrote Seneca, "took place when Rome's pragmatism ceased to be pragmatic."
Hmm... sounds familiar.
8 posted on
12/14/2008 10:10:40 AM PST by
modhom
To: happinesswithoutpeace
If the conservative government falls, it’s exactly what the leftist agitators wanted!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson