Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: happinesswithoutpeace

Why does the author talk about “classical liberalism” and “the left” as if they’re polar opposites?


3 posted on 12/14/2008 9:50:56 AM PST by lainie (The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lainie
Liberalism in Europe had a very different meaning from "liberalism" in modern American politics. Liberalism was originally associated with notions of liberty, inalienable rights, responsible self-government (not necessarily implying universal suffrage)--the ideas people like John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, or the Marquis de LaFayette would have agreed with.

It's only later (mid-19th century on) that the idea that a utopia can be created catches on, and with it the idea that the government is the agent to do that, the inspiration for "Progressives" in America from the early 1900s to the present.

5 posted on 12/14/2008 9:59:02 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lainie

Short version: Classical liberalism is much closer to views held by conservatives (rights of the individual, markets, etc) than by socialists or “American Liberalism”.

There are those who feel that the term “liberal” has been hijacked in a sense.


6 posted on 12/14/2008 10:01:01 AM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lainie
Classical liberalism = freedom/individualism
Modern Leftism = servitude/collectivism

Sounds like polar opposites to me

9 posted on 12/14/2008 10:18:16 AM PST by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson