To: happinesswithoutpeace
Why does the author talk about “classical liberalism” and “the left” as if they’re polar opposites?
3 posted on
12/14/2008 9:50:56 AM PST by
lainie
(The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
To: lainie
Liberalism in Europe had a very different meaning from "liberalism" in modern American politics. Liberalism was originally associated with notions of liberty, inalienable rights, responsible self-government (not necessarily implying universal suffrage)--the ideas people like John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, or the Marquis de LaFayette would have agreed with.
It's only later (mid-19th century on) that the idea that a utopia can be created catches on, and with it the idea that the government is the agent to do that, the inspiration for "Progressives" in America from the early 1900s to the present.
To: lainie
Short version: Classical liberalism is much closer to views held by conservatives (rights of the individual, markets, etc) than by socialists or “American Liberalism”.
There are those who feel that the term “liberal” has been hijacked in a sense.
To: lainie
Classical liberalism = freedom/individualism
Modern Leftism = servitude/collectivism
Sounds like polar opposites to me
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson