I am currently of the opinion that the media—in the septic tank for their demigods the democrats—are puirposely squelching this story to lend it no voice so that no groundswell of outrage can develop in order to impel action by cowardly Republicans and Congressional Democrats. The media has become—by their own willful acts—the fifth column enemy of We The People, whereas the framers considered the press to be the fourth estate. The media are traitors operating within our borders. Outside of the U.S the story has growing interest.
I agree, it’s blatantly obvious.
But if we could get some help from outgoing members, that would be televised on CSPAN, at least.
I have three questions for you and would appreciate hearing your opinion. Actually I would like anyone to weigh in if they can answer my questions or give their opinions.
We will know Monday whether the Justices will hear Cort’s case. Do you think it is possible that the SC Justices will consider joining the cases together and hear them AFTER the Electoral College vote due to the fact that Obama will not actually BE “President-Elect” until AFTER the vote on Monday?
I understand that a Judge in the Washington State SC has decided to hear a case. (I hope what I heard is correct.)
Is it possible for the Washington Supreme Court Judge to issue a stay in that State’s Electoral College vote on Monday?
The Electoral College meet at each state capital to cast their votes on Monday. If one or more Electoral College members of a particular state raise the question of constitutional qualifications, does that state Electoral College group have to resolve the issue before casting their votes?