Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why must it come Down to Popular V. Patriotic: The Obama Eligibility Question?
American Chronicle ^ | December 10, 2008 | Rev. Michael Bresciani

Posted on 12/10/2008 12:19:19 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2008 12:19:19 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Puh-leeze. Comparing a band of WingNutDaily loons to the Founders of the Republic??

Yeah, maybe if Paul Revere had ridden through the countryside yelling "The Martians are coming!"

2 posted on 12/10/2008 12:29:10 PM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Constitution shmonstitution.

Barrack Obama don't need no stinking Constitution.

He knows better than all the Founding Fathers and every president or judge that has preceded him, and will fix that "fundamentally flawed" document to say whatever he feels like it should say.

3 posted on 12/10/2008 12:31:33 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
It should be the "yes" of every citizen in the continental United States and not one of them should ever be referred to as the "fringe."

What about the people of Hawaii?

4 posted on 12/10/2008 12:32:22 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American

You may think you’re joking, or being hyperbolic,

but really, this IS how they think.

The founders... heck, anyone that passes a law or ratifies a Constitution or amendment, temporally (in time), cannot by definition have the information available to today’s decision makers,

who therefore should not be held to the restrictions imposed by people having less information than today’s decision makers.

Thomas Sowell, Conflict of Visions, page 81:
http://books.google.com/books?id=NwrWDM8FW04C&pg=PA81&lpg=PA81&dq=%22conflict+of+visions%22+intertemporal&source=web&ots=bH_xvtMD46&sig=2E04Fpgl2pFcEE0rMKLAPe6bFPI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA81,M1


5 posted on 12/10/2008 12:37:22 PM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Puh-leeze. Comparing a band of WingNutDaily loons to the Founders of the Republic??

Yeah, maybe if Paul Revere had ridden through the countryside yelling "The Martians are coming!"

You are not that far off.

It was World Net Daily founder Joseph Farah who goes around yelling "Pterodactyls are on this very day, flying above the skies of Africa and Asia!"

6 posted on 12/10/2008 12:37:53 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The people who are fighting for this issue to be heard are patriots in the truest sense of the word.

God speed to them.


7 posted on 12/10/2008 12:37:58 PM PST by stockpirate (2009 year of the tax revolt. Two arms, two arms, the socialists are coming.....burp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Our founding fathers faced hanging for a chance to create the constitution. I can face ridicule at the hands of constitutional cowards to defend it.


8 posted on 12/10/2008 12:38:07 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Yeah, maybe if Paul Revere had ridden through the countryside yelling "The Martians are coming!"

Best line of the day!

I am skeptical on both sides of the "natural born citizen" debate ... mostly because there is no sensible reason (other than a serious flaw in the certificate, if it even exists) for Obama to keep the real birth certificate locked up ... but WND is one of the few sources that I trust even less than I trust Dan Rather.

9 posted on 12/10/2008 12:39:50 PM PST by MathDoc (War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. Obama is Good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

bttt


10 posted on 12/10/2008 12:40:39 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; trumandogz; steve-b
To the skeptics, answer the question:
Can we ask our young men and women to put their lives up to defend and uphold our constitution and not expect the Supreme Court justices to at least look at the Obama eligibility question? Can we at the very least ask our President Elect to provide certain proof that he is in compliance with our nation´s most important document as well?
11 posted on 12/10/2008 1:05:44 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

I have faith that the Four Strict Constructionists on the SCOTUS will uphold the Constitution.

If you believe that those justices are not upholding the Constitution, you can ask your U.S. Senator to introduce a resolution to impeach Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito.

Does that sound like a good idea to you?


12 posted on 12/10/2008 1:12:02 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

To carry your arguement even further.

Shouldn’t we expect the leaders of our OWN FREAKING party to question his COLB?

Shouldn’t we expect our conservative members of the media to question this or EVEN DISCUSS it on the air?

Where is Rush? Where is Sean? Where is Laura? Where is Mark?

Cowards all, I refuse to listen to them or watch them again.


13 posted on 12/10/2008 1:12:53 PM PST by stockpirate (2009 year of the tax revolt. Two arms, two arms, the socialists are coming.....burp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

The crux of it is, he knew about the laws and lied.


14 posted on 12/10/2008 1:14:17 PM PST by Tomato lover (How happy would our world be if men either knew more or practically knew how little they know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Puh-leeze. Comparing a band of WingNutDaily loons to the Founders of the Republic??

There's probably more of an apt comparison there, than to the Nirther loons over at LGF. They're afraid of being mocked. So they mock. Very brave.

15 posted on 12/10/2008 1:18:48 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Shouldn’t we expect the leaders of our OWN FREAKING party to question his COLB?

No, our own candidate had the same problem, hence that weird little quid pro quo back in April, known as SR 511.

16 posted on 12/10/2008 1:21:18 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
The people who are fighting for this issue to be heard are patriots in the truest sense of the word.

Tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy kooks are seldom patriotic. That fact that they're in bed with a Hillary Clinton supporting 9-11 truther raises a red flag.

17 posted on 12/10/2008 1:22:45 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Puh-leeze. Comparing a band of WingNutDaily loons to the Founders of the Republic??

At the risk of being branded a loon, I believe the Supreme Court owes the country their time and effort in putting this issue to bed once and for all.

There is enough question on both sides of the issue.

The Supreme Court Justices should not be COWARDS by letting this issue pass without action and comment on their part.

First it sets a bad precedent for similar future issues that the Court will not touch it. Second, if any solid and real evidence came out later that Barry Obama were not eligible, all hell could break loose. The time for Court review and comment is before he takes office, not after.

These are not "normal times", and the Supreme Court should do something to help prevent a future problem.

18 posted on 12/10/2008 1:23:56 PM PST by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So we should all take Obama’s word on this - even though he refuses to show his birth certificate.


19 posted on 12/10/2008 1:28:42 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
That fact that they're in bed with a Hillary Clinton supporting 9-11 truther raises a red flag.

By the same logic, you're in bed with Obama. Talk about raising a red flag.

20 posted on 12/10/2008 1:29:58 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson