Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the U.N. Chill Out on Climate Change? - The U.N.'s own observations show no warming trend...
National Review Online ^ | December 09, 2008 | Patrick J. Michaels

Posted on 12/09/2008 9:16:36 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2008 9:16:36 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I think it is much cooler here in my neck of the woods, than average.


2 posted on 12/09/2008 9:20:45 PM PST by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Al Gore himself descends on Wednesday to personally bless the conclave’s work product”

Climate Pimp Algore. I’ll give him credit for one thing, he saw a great racket to get into on the ground floor.


3 posted on 12/09/2008 9:20:54 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Manbearpig bump.


4 posted on 12/09/2008 9:25:02 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Anybody got a hot air-sickness bag? I think I’m gonna puke.


5 posted on 12/09/2008 9:26:11 PM PST by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Global Warming getting debunked by the data as we speak. The models are broken and basing policy on broken models is the ultimate in stupidity.


6 posted on 12/09/2008 9:47:23 PM PST by WOSG (Obama - a born in the USA socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
The models are broken and basing policy on broken models is the ultimate in stupidity.

LOL...want to go back to the bronze age?

We use broken models for so many things...the key is in understanding that the models aren't perfect. In the common paraphrase of George Box: “All models are wrong, but some are useful.”

A poor calibration on a model doesn't mean it's not useful or appropriate for the decision at hand.

7 posted on 12/09/2008 11:10:27 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
A poor calibration on a model doesn't mean it's not useful or appropriate for the decision at hand.

LOL, very funny stuff.

8 posted on 12/09/2008 11:32:34 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Kyoto was supposed to reduce global emissions of carbon dioxide below 1990 levels during the period 2008–2012. But, since it was signed, the atmospheric concentration of this putative pollutant continued to rise, pretty much at the same rate it did before Kyoto. Incidentally, even if the world had lived up to the letter of the Kyoto law, the effect on global temperature would have been too small to measure.

Right or wrong about climate change, this is a strawman argument. Kyoto was meant to reverse the upward trend in emissions among inudstrialized nations not "solve" climate change. Most of the countries that committed to Kyoto reductions have managed to grow their economies and cut emissions at the same time. The point was to change direction, not to fundamentally alter the temperature. That would take more ambitious goals. So either this guy does not understand the treaty and is therefore not bright enough to analyze science or he is intentionally trying to be misleading - (which is exactly what he claims that the people in Poznan are doing). I would go for the latter.

9 posted on 12/10/2008 12:30:58 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Bomb Liechtenstein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
A poor calibration on a model doesn't mean it's not useful or appropriate for the decision at hand.

Depends upon your definition of 'useful' - and whether or not that definition fits within valid scientific guidelines or political ones instead.

10 posted on 12/10/2008 3:20:40 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
Most of the countries that committed to Kyoto reductions have managed to grow their economies and cut emissions at the same time.

Show me any G-8 signatory of Kyoto that has cut CO2 emissions.

11 posted on 12/10/2008 3:21:25 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I don't see how the UN and the global warming truthers like Gore are going to ever admit the facts...they're too invested in their own fabrications.
12 posted on 12/10/2008 3:52:40 AM PST by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Germany.


13 posted on 12/10/2008 4:40:51 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Bomb Liechtenstein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
If Algore’s showing up in Poland, I assume there will probably be record cold temps for Central Europe?
14 posted on 12/10/2008 4:54:22 AM PST by HenpeckedCon (1/20/13 - Obama's Last Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
Germany.
Horse sh&t! The only reason Germany's emissions were lower is because all of the filthy commie factories in the former DDR were shut down. That's why Germany insisted that 1990 be the base year for emission reductions. Kyoto had one purpose and one purpose only, ruin the economy of the United States.
15 posted on 12/10/2008 5:00:42 AM PST by HenpeckedCon (1/20/13 - Obama's Last Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; ..
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

16 posted on 12/10/2008 5:51:42 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon
Show me any G-8 signatory of Kyoto that has cut CO2 emissions.

You wrote that. I answered with one country about which I was certain. What do you want from me? You could have written "except those devious Germans".

On the other hand I can point out that ALL of European G-8 have cut emissions and except for Italy they will probably meet their Kyoto targets.

Here you go:

France: -4.2% below 1990

Germany: -18% below 1990 (more than accounting for the East)

Netherlands: -8.4% Italy -4.6% below 1990 UK - 20% below 1990

Germany is still the world's largest exporter. The UK has had a booming economy. Basically your statement about hurting the American economy proves you don't believe Americans are capable of innovation. Pitiful that you have so littel confidence in your own nation. Maybe you are in part of the country that is not "real America"?

17 posted on 12/10/2008 6:22:23 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Bomb Liechtenstein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I beg to differ.

They weren’t basing policy on a bad model.

They contrived a model to justify their policy (global socialism).

And if this one fails to gain traction, they’ll look for another one.


18 posted on 12/10/2008 6:23:49 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
LOL, very funny stuff.

Not to the victims of Hurricane Ike.

While the model was incorrect on exactly where landfall would be, it was useful to know that a hurricane was coming to some region of the Gulf Coast.

19 posted on 12/10/2008 7:42:52 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Good point, as an engineer I get your point (all models have error)

... but these models are beyond merely erroneous, they are the supporting arguments for a fraud and only ‘useful’ in promoting horrible public policies for a ‘threat’ that isnt really there.

Proof of fraud? Let IPCC tell us what the accuracy metrics, error bars and disqualification criteria are for these models. They cant because there arent any. They have turned hypothesis into (imagined) reality without bothering with validation and confirmation!


20 posted on 12/10/2008 8:48:41 AM PST by WOSG (Obama - a born in the USA socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson