Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback

[[I said that Paul said that scripture is God-breathed.]]

Exactly, and God is incpable of lying, and when He asked Job if Job was there when He created species, and named several, He was confirming that He indeed DID create species.

Those who sin (IE do not accept Christ as Savior) will be punished. Animals have no such judgement by God, and God clearly told Adam that eating hte fruit (sinning) that man is deciding to serve sin and so must be punished. If we’re ‘evovled from apes’ and we’re nothign but animals, how is it that we’re in danger of losing our SOUL to eternal damnation? Did God lie to us in His word when He told us sin = eternal death then?

From the Rib came Eve. Did God LIE to us then too?

God searched the animals and FOUND NO LIKE KIND for a mate for Adam- Again, if we’re all descended from animals, why was there no mate to be found? Again- Did God LIE to us when He told us this in His word? If Adam was descended from Apes- Certainly htere must have been very many mates that had ‘evovled’ right along with Adam? But Nope- We’re told Adam was a VERY unique special creation with a Soul, and no mates were found- But apparently, those who think evolution and God’s word are compatible, must then think that God LIED to us- something He is incapable of.

Now that we’ve discussed this, let us not forget that Macroevoltuion is a biological impossibility, A mathematical impossibility (and not just some ‘lotto-type crap-shoot either- it’s a major major impossibility to evolve just one ‘positive mutaiton’- let along create major masses of non species specific info in order for species to move onward and upward in ever complex ‘self-assembling’ configurations- somethign that biolgical science can NOT even show is possible- and infact is biolgogically impossible- mutations + time can NOT create the absolutely necessary NON species specific info NEEDED to move species beyond their own kinds) so it’s just plain silly to even suggest God ‘started creation’ then ‘left species to evolve on their own’ and htose that do IGNORE the scientific FACTS of biology, all in the name of ‘reconciling evolution with God’s word’- they exchange the TRUTH for the lie of Macreovoltuion, and apparently are trying to convince Creationists that their faith based belief in Macroevoltuion is superior to God’s TRUTH, and to the actual scientific FACTS that refute Macroevoltuion.

It’s NO simple matter to violate several scientific and natural laws- especially in the mind boggling numbers that would be absolutely essential IF macroevo0ltuion were a reality. Trillions of ever increasingly complex and sefl-assembling NON species specific information would have to just materialize out of nowhere, because again, simply altering species specific info simply is NOT able to create this essential genetic information.

But alas, al lthis scientific facts simply gets ignored and it’s argued that ‘God allowed evolution’ even htough it was biolgically impossible? Amazing! The only way someone can claim God’s word and evoltuion are compatible is to state that God is a liar, and that He deceived us in His word.


298 posted on 12/10/2008 1:46:34 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
But alas, al lthis scientific facts simply gets ignored and it’s argued that ‘God allowed evolution’ even htough it was biolgically impossible? Amazing! The only way someone can claim God’s word and evoltuion are compatible is to state that God is a liar, and that He deceived us in His word.

Great post...just keep in mind that some of them believe that not because they think God's a liar, but just because they haven't thought through the implications.

299 posted on 12/10/2008 2:19:04 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

Nice...

I especially like the part about Adam and no mate.

How would someone “de-allegoryize” that?

In other words, what in evolution could account for a Man not having a female of his own species, and then one appearing for him?


300 posted on 12/10/2008 2:22:24 PM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson