[[Well ... he’s right. Some things in the Bible are, of course, literally true (archaeology can prove it).]]
The fact is htough, that IF he believes evolution is true, then he doesn’t beleive important biblical truths are literal. His statement is inline with many professing Christians who really just have a head knowledge of God and Christ, but not true heart knowledge. I’m not saying President Bush isn’t infact saved, but his statements certainly cast doubt on that. Many ‘good’ people proclaim to be followers, but even ‘good’ people will miss the mark and be cast out of heaven. I hope Pres. Bush is saved, for his own sake, but really, his statements are indeed troubling, and I don’t think they are just said just because he isn’t well versed i nthe bible, I think he said htem because he truly isn’t sure about some important key biblical issues and doubts they were literal, and I don’t think he was just talking about parables either- I think he meant he wasn’t sure about things like the whole creation event, and perhaps somem ore key theological issues.
I know almost certainly that Barack isn’t saved, and most likely just went to church because it was politically expedient to do so (He no doubt wanted to ‘instill some values’ in his children too- but here again- we see him sitting under a bitter vicious ‘preacher’ who only has a head knowledge of God and CERTAINLY not a heart knowledge)
Where does the Bible lay out God's exact methods?
His statement is inline with many professing Christians who really just have a head knowledge of God and Christ, but not true heart knowledge.
Oh, come now. What you're really saying is, real Christians must deny any and all scientific evidence that runs counter to your personal view of how God does what He does.