Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot

You said — “The 20th was the first amendment to address a President elect’s failure to qualify and covers exactly what we are facing today. Further, 3 USC 15 sets out the precise method by which the Congress at its Jan 8 joint session, may object to and challenge the qualifications of the PE.”

How is anyone challenging this in that forum going to get it past a majority Democrat Party who is going to insist on Obama... That ain’t gonna work... Just remember who is running the show now...

You don’t *really* think that Democrats are going to jeopardize their own political futures by admitting that they got it wrong with Obama, do you? LOL...


41 posted on 12/09/2008 10:29:13 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

“How is anyone challenging this in that forum going to get it past a majority Democrat Party who is going to insist on Obama... That ain’t gonna work... You don’t *really* think that Democrats are going to jeopardize their own political futures by admitting that they got it wrong with Obama, do you? LOL...”

Do you suppose the USSC will allow a Dem-controlled Congress to vote for a result that is clearly contrary to the plain meaning of the Constitution?

Does one have to be a space cadet prior to becoming a Star Traveler?


54 posted on 12/09/2008 4:52:28 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson