Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lifespan management, for instance, examines the critical question of how long boomers will remain healthy and productive. Then there is the personal wealth issue with the latest financial crisis, many boomers having seen declines in their net worth.

It is predicted that boomers may face the real possibility of a collapse of living systems in their lifetimes. Food, energy, and materials may well undergo disruptions as climate changes and water crises become realities.

We won't run out of food and water, The One will save us.

And yeah, many in our parents generation didn't have to worry about the dissipation of wealth, nor about long lifespans.

It's tough to be a boomer.

1 posted on 12/08/2008 5:57:06 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

Liberals can’t cope, Conservatives know how.
There was a great movie on YouTube about these two people who were on an escalator that stopped. They stood there hollering for help just like typical Lib’s .... they couldn’t figure out that all they had to do is just walk up the stopped escalator - they wanted someone to walk down to get them ....


2 posted on 12/08/2008 6:00:50 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
yeah ,but look how much you save on toilet tissue....save trees, blah,blah,blah
3 posted on 12/08/2008 6:01:32 PM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

“forming economic, health, and social collectives and families “

oh boy, I’m going to be in a rest home run by an incontinent che guavera demanding that I share my wheat germ stockpile with the collective.


4 posted on 12/08/2008 6:01:39 PM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Oh please. There are any number of fat, juicy morsels running around the malls.

I figure a couple of hundred a year before anyone notices.

*And as a bonus, the food on the hoof is all liberal! Less democrat voters.


6 posted on 12/08/2008 6:08:43 PM PST by OpusatFR (Neither Republican or Democrat. Monarchist with allegience to The Only One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The best analogy that I've seen for the Boomer Generation is like that of a bad meal...you just have to get it through your system to recover.

They have been a wrecking ball throughout our society. From the first days of drugs and sex at colleges, to domination and destruction of education, to our huge national debt, our housing crash, and soon on to permanently wreck Social Security.

Thanks Boomers, you were wonderful to this country.

(yea, yea, some Boomers are good conservatives, but as a generation, they have left nothing in their wake)

9 posted on 12/08/2008 6:23:43 PM PST by BobL (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/blog/4556 (here is where the real Europe is going))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

I’ve always taken issue with the 1946-1964 Boomer definition. I was born in ‘61, and have very little in common with those born in the forties and fifties. I was watching Captain Kangaroo during the Summer of Love.


11 posted on 12/08/2008 6:26:06 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
It is predicted that boomers may face the real possibility of a collapse of living systems in their lifetimes. Food, energy, and materials may well undergo disruptions as climate changes and water crises become realities.

Living systems? Perhaps their greed and short sightedness will force them back to the communes they once idolized?

12 posted on 12/08/2008 6:34:11 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"These risks are not isolated but are interrelated, forming part of an 'ecology of risk.' Fortunately, boomers have amassed personal, social, experiential, economic and even spiritual assets that they can call on as they age. They will use these assets to craft distinctive ecologies of resources to respond to highly individual ecologies of risk."

Damn!, I like that.

14 posted on 12/08/2008 6:35:14 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"lifespan management?" -- by whom?

"healthy and productive" -- according to whom?

This is shaping up to be an awfully apocolyptic sounding era.

21 posted on 12/08/2008 6:52:20 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (making full use of an unfair advantage in the marketplace of ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Wow! Now I know what BO meant by lowering the water levels.


22 posted on 12/08/2008 6:54:35 PM PST by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
you are a boomer, a member of the most intriguing population this country has ever known.

I'm a boomer. Listening to boomers, whose discourse tends to be ignorant and self-referential, is usually like watching paint dry.

29 posted on 12/08/2008 7:04:25 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; VigilantAmerican

My hair is so very gray, so please forgive me for not knowing where “we” fit!

DH was born in ‘39, and me in ‘43. We raised 4 wonderful children. Three of them are all self-supporting, giving back citizens. One didn’t make it past 21, due to a heart defect from birth.

We, as parents, self-employed, struggled over the years to deal with ever-changing tax laws, interest rates, and economic booms and busts.

We paid and paid and paid into the Fed Gov. And, we are now struggling with the inevitable diseases of decline, Parkinsons’s, Arthritis, Fibro, etc.

What should we do? Follow the Amer-Indian tradition, so our children will not be hampered in their efforts to survive? If you do not think this is a conservative question, then you are not really a conservative, are you?

While you all bash the boomers, please consider that some of us did our best to hold down the fort, while the MSM did everything within their power to elevate the ridiculous among us, and never paid much attention to those of us who kept on doing our best.

In summary, think about who you all are blaming for the disaster that is about to befall all of us, and it is not the people, but it is the media and their sycophants, the MSM.


36 posted on 12/08/2008 7:31:36 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

“And yeah, many in our parents generation didn’t have to worry about the dissipation of wealth, nor about long lifespans.”

What a load of BS!

Most of my generation are still going strong in their 70s and 80s.

I can name on one hand the number of relatives on both sides of my family that have died (other than in war) under 90 in the last 200 years.


60 posted on 12/08/2008 10:19:28 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson