What they might be saying is that until he is sworn in - there is no problem. Once sworn in, the first piece of legislation that he vetos and the first Presidential executive order that he puts into place it is back to the Supreme Court because anyone and everyone is affected by a fraud being elected, but we can’t show harm until that happens. No law has been broken yet.
Jees if this is let stand and that skinny big eared weasel never has to show his birth certificate, or prove where he was born, that means that the next president might be a terrorist from madigascar - as long as he is a liberal Democrat.
Does any one know if there have been any supreme court decisions when the prosecuting attorney turns out to have not been qualified or was found not to be an attorney?
The cases are overturned and have to be retried don’t they?