No Hawaiian court has ever ruled on this. Where are you getting that info ?
Here:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081121/NEWS20/811210355/1001/localnewsfront
Writ of mandamus denied because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate standing, that irreparable harm would be done without relief, and that the public interest overwhelmed the right to privacy. In addition, the state Health Department director testified that she had examined the original document and found it legitimate.
So, to make my point again, the court did not find that the document was legitimate, but only that it was entitled to that presumption.