Posted on 12/07/2008 12:45:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge
CHICAGO - President-elect Barack Obama announced support Sunday for a short-term government bailout of the nation's carmakers that is tied to industry restructuring. He also accused auto executives of a persistent "head-in-the sand approach" to long-festering problems.
Obama said Congress was doing "the exact right thing" in drafting legislation that "holds the auto industry's feet to the fire" at the same time it tries to prevent its demise.
In an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" and later at a news conference, Obama at one point suggested some executives should lose their jobs.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Advice from someone who couldnt find his birth certificate if he used both hands.
Hope and Change.
“Advice from someone who couldnt find his birth certificate if he used both hands.”
I’m sure the end explaination will be that he mistakenly wiped with it and it got flushed!
New York Times Omits Freddie Mac from Emanuel’s Resume
Front page business profile doesn’t mention two-year stint with troubled government sponsored enterprise.
By Matt Philbin
Business & Media Institute
12/4/2008 2:33:08 PM
Is it immature to say, We told you so?
The Business & Media Institute on Nov. 6 noted the medias tendency to grant incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel a free pass on his history with the taxpayer-rescued government sponsored enterprise (GSE) Freddie Mac. The New York Times continued the trend in a front page business profile of Emanuel Dec. 4.
Emanuel served on the GSEs board of directors between 2000 and 2001 a period during which the organization was mired in political contribution and accounting scandals. But you wouldnt know that from reading the Times profile.
The article, In Banking, Top Obama Aide Made Money and Connections, examined Emanuels banking career after leaving the Clinton White House in late 1998. Author Michael Luo wrote, The period before he was elected to a House seat from Illinois is a little-known episode of Mr. Emanuels biography. And an important part of it seems destined to stay little-known.
Heavily sourced and researched, the nearly 1,700-word Times piece mentioned 12 separate companies and 16 individuals that figured in Emanuels career over the three years in question. But Luo didnt find space for a single mention of Emanuels involvement with Freddie Mac during the same time period.
Emanuel went on to make more than $18 million in just two-and-a-half years, turning many of his contacts in his substantial political Rolodex into paying clients and directing his negotiating prowess and trademark intensity to mergers and acquisitions, Luo wrote. Presumably, that prowess and trademark intensity is what earned him more than $260,000 in directors fees from Freddie Mac in 2000 2001, as the Chicago Sun-Times reported on Jan. 3, 2002.
Some other numbers are missing from the Times article. Luo discussed at length Emanuels strong ties with an industry now at the heart of the economic crisis, his ongoing relationships with financial executives, and the more than $1.5 million theyve contributed to his congressional campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). But the Times didnt mention another number available from the CRP: the $51,750 Freddie Mac and sister organization Fannie Mae have given Emanuel.
Commendably, Luo looked into the possibility that all those contacts and all that cash from the financial service sector might have clouded Emanuels judgment while voting on issues of consequence to the industry, though he found no evidence of that.
But while entertaining questions of money, ethics and conflicts of interest, Luo should have noted that Freddie Mac paid a $3.8 million fine for illegal political contributions made during the years Emanuel served on its board. And that when Emanuel arrived in Congress, he served on the subcommittee charged with oversight of his former employer, Freddie Mac
LOL. A definite contender for "ugliest car, ever."
Sounds about right. They think because they’re salary, they don’t have to work a minute past 40 hours a week. I’m salary, and I used to dream of working only 40 hours a week. I put in the hours because it needs to be done.
Didn’t you get the memo,
Financial institutions= Good,
Manufacturers= Bad.
Only financial sector executives are removed from responsibility.
The rest are thrown to the wolves.
Since when does the government get in the business of running auto companies?
Wow! Obummer lacks the business administration knowledge to run a lemonaid stand, and he wants to critique Auto manufacturing execs?
Arrogance? Hubris? Stupidity !!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.