Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama suggests some auto execs should lose jobs
AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/7/08 | Philip Elliott - ap

Posted on 12/07/2008 12:45:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge

CHICAGO - President-elect Barack Obama announced support Sunday for a short-term government bailout of the nation's carmakers that is tied to industry restructuring. He also accused auto executives of a persistent "head-in-the sand approach" to long-festering problems.

Obama said Congress was doing "the exact right thing" in drafting legislation that "holds the auto industry's feet to the fire" at the same time it tries to prevent its demise.

In an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" and later at a news conference, Obama at one point suggested some executives should lose their jobs.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: autoexecs; automakers; bho2008; ceo; detroit; illegalpresident; losejobs; obama; obamatransitionfile; opap; ossociatedpress; suggests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: dalereed
Advice from someone that has never held a job let alone one with executive responsibility!

Advice from someone who couldnt find his birth certificate if he used both hands.

61 posted on 12/07/2008 3:45:39 PM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Obama at one point suggested some executives should lose their jobs.

Hope and Change.

62 posted on 12/07/2008 3:54:49 PM PST by Stentor (b. July 4, 1776 - d. January 20, 2009 sorely missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

“Advice from someone who couldnt find his birth certificate if he used both hands.”

I’m sure the end explaination will be that he mistakenly wiped with it and it got flushed!


63 posted on 12/07/2008 4:12:40 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Atlas Puked...
64 posted on 12/07/2008 4:58:08 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

New York Times Omits Freddie Mac from Emanuel’s Resume
Front page business profile doesn’t mention two-year stint with troubled government sponsored enterprise.

By Matt Philbin
Business & Media Institute
12/4/2008 2:33:08 PM

Is it immature to say, “We told you so?”

The Business & Media Institute on Nov. 6 noted the media’s tendency to grant incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel a free pass on his history with the taxpayer-rescued government sponsored enterprise (GSE) Freddie Mac. The New York Times continued the trend in a front page business profile of Emanuel Dec. 4.

Emanuel served on the GSE’s board of directors between 2000 and 2001 – a period during which the organization was mired in political contribution and accounting scandals. But you wouldn’t know that from reading the Times’ profile.

The article, “In Banking, Top Obama Aide Made Money and Connections,” examined Emanuel’s banking career after leaving the Clinton White House in late 1998. Author Michael Luo wrote, “The period before he was elected to a House seat from Illinois is a little-known episode of Mr. Emanuel’s biography.” And an important part of it seems destined to stay little-known.

Heavily sourced and researched, the nearly 1,700-word Times piece mentioned 12 separate companies and 16 individuals that figured in Emanuel’s career over the three years in question. But Luo didn’t find space for a single mention of Emanuel’s involvement with Freddie Mac during the same time period.

Emanuel “went on to make more than $18 million in just two-and-a-half years, turning many of his contacts in his substantial political Rolodex into paying clients and directing his negotiating prowess and trademark intensity to mergers and acquisitions,” Luo wrote. Presumably, that “prowess and trademark intensity” is what earned him more than $260,000 in “director’s fees” from Freddie Mac in 2000 – 2001, as the Chicago Sun-Times reported on Jan. 3, 2002.

Some other numbers are missing from the Times article. Luo discussed at length Emanuel’s “strong ties with an industry now at the heart of the economic crisis,” his ongoing relationships with financial executives, and the more than $1.5 million they’ve contributed to his congressional campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). But the Times didn’t mention another number available from the CRP: the $51,750 Freddie Mac and sister organization Fannie Mae have given Emanuel.

Commendably, Luo looked into the possibility that all those contacts and all that cash from the financial service sector might have clouded Emanuel’s judgment while voting on issues of consequence to the industry, though he found “no evidence” of that.

But while entertaining questions of money, ethics and conflicts of interest, Luo should have noted that Freddie Mac paid a $3.8 million fine for illegal political contributions made during the years Emanuel served on its board. And that when Emanuel arrived in Congress, he served on the subcommittee charged with oversight of his former employer, Freddie Mac


65 posted on 12/07/2008 5:23:52 PM PST by thetru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The CEO who thought that that the Pontiac Aztec would sell should be fired.

LOL. A definite contender for "ugliest car, ever."

66 posted on 12/07/2008 6:22:21 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th

Sounds about right. They think because they’re salary, they don’t have to work a minute past 40 hours a week. I’m salary, and I used to dream of working only 40 hours a week. I put in the hours because it needs to be done.


67 posted on 12/07/2008 7:03:14 PM PST by factoryrat (Better living through American Industrial Might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Didn’t you get the memo,

Financial institutions= Good,

Manufacturers= Bad.

Only financial sector executives are removed from responsibility.

The rest are thrown to the wolves.


68 posted on 12/07/2008 7:11:17 PM PST by factoryrat (Better living through American Industrial Might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

Since when does the government get in the business of running auto companies?


69 posted on 12/07/2008 7:21:01 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wow! Obummer lacks the business administration knowledge to run a lemonaid stand, and he wants to critique Auto manufacturing execs?

Arrogance? Hubris? Stupidity !!!!!


70 posted on 12/07/2008 7:25:02 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson