Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PlainOleAmerican

I know the announcement is due tomorrow, but i want to caution folks that not all the BC eggs are in this one basket of a case.

It is entirely possible that the justices want to hear the controversy, but do not believe this is the right case to do it.

i wish i was a fly on the wall for that conference, because i suspect it was a doozy.


2 posted on 12/07/2008 11:17:14 AM PST by Canedawg ("The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Canedawg

Sometimes it just takes one person. I would like to be a fly on the wall too.


5 posted on 12/07/2008 11:20:01 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Canedawg

“I know the announcement is due tomorrow, but i want to caution folks that not all the BC eggs are in this one basket of a case.
It is entirely possible that the justices want to hear the controversy, but do not believe this is the right case to do it.
i wish i was a fly on the wall for that conference, because i suspect it was a doozy.”

I am glad to see you might consider this Donofrio case of enought merit to at least read about. Your responce to me (below) from another thread was not so soft spoken. We all are here to seek the truth and everyone is working towards that end.

FROM THE OTHER THREAD:
Report: Obama Campaign Invested in Rockers, Tattoos
Sunday, December 07, 2008 12:30:49 PM · 13 of 20
Canedawg to seekthetruth

Put a sock in it.

If you want to review my posting history about the BC cases, be my guest. it goes all the way back to analyzing the actual complaint and motion papers, as well as the decision filed in the berg case.
***********************************
AND MY REPLY WAS:

Well, I find it difficult to “put a sock in it”. The fact that that all nine SC Justices referred the Donofrio case to Conference is important. They must have felt it had merit to at least consider. The decision to hear the case fully (or not) will come out tomorrow as far as I know.
Who knows what will happen? I sure don’t but will trust in the SC decision. I am continuing to seek the truth and certainly want to be corrected if I state something that is not factual.

You mentioned the Berg case. I can see where that case may have been considered to not have merit. I really have been more focused on the Donofrio case and the great detail his research is on his web site. Tomorrow we will know if the Justices (at least four) think his case should be fully heard. :)


18 posted on 12/07/2008 11:37:08 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Canedawg

It may not be due tomorrow it could happen anytime next week.

According to the Washington Times:

“A spokesman for the court said the decision on whether to hear the suit brought by retired New Jersey lawyer Leo Donofrio is likely to be announced next week.”

The Supreme Court could be pondering this some more and are giving it time. It’s possible they could stay the electoral vote on the 15th.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/06/obama-challenge-awaits-a-decision/


185 posted on 12/07/2008 1:59:59 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Canedawg
I know the announcement is due tomorrow, but i want to caution folks that not all the BC eggs are in this one basket of a case.

Wise word.

i wish i was a fly on the wall for that conference, because i suspect it was a doozy.

Nominated for post of the day.

For anyone who wants to know about the Donofrio suit.

248 posted on 12/07/2008 5:30:10 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson