Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ebiskit

Old news—which was still not covered by the msm. The libs and the good ole boy “conservatives” are really afraid of what havoc Sarah could cause next time around.


2 posted on 12/07/2008 4:37:52 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freeangel

This should get the prominent news coverage that the original allegations received.

But no, the MSM is more concerned about her daughter’s sex life. Oh my gosh, her daughter got pregnant without a husband, tsk tsk. And do we know who the real mother of Sarah’s baby is — I don’t think the MSM drove that story into the ground yet.

I’m still steamed at the N.Y. Times, about the Sarah Palin baby and daughter pregnancy stories. I still can’t believe, that they way they talk about journalistic ethics and values, that they ran those stories. Their “source” for their front-page stories were half-assed bloggers spouting stream of consciouness nonsense on liberal blog sites. What the heck ever happened to fact checking and editing? I guess though, if something appears on a DU or Daily Kos type blog, it is gospel truth. So of course they went with those stories.


35 posted on 12/07/2008 9:26:36 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson