Local TV video at link.
To: Inappropriate Laughter
Breathlessly awaiting the cop groupies....
2 posted on
12/06/2008 10:46:15 PM PST by
JoJo Gunn
(The GOP is as anatomically correct as a Ken doll. ©)
To: Inappropriate Laughter
3 posted on
12/06/2008 10:47:42 PM PST by
no-s
To: Inappropriate Laughter
I have a huge electric bill.
I have a part of my house (my office) that has to be cooled even in the winter...
Does that mean I’m going to get a visit by SWAT???
4 posted on
12/06/2008 10:48:49 PM PST by
DB
To: bamahead
7 posted on
12/06/2008 11:03:37 PM PST by
KoRn
To: Inappropriate Laughter
I think that the police have problems with violation of the law under color of authority and going beyond the scope of their duties. While they generally have immunity when a search warrant is issued, that immunity can be negated when there is deliberate deception. I think there will be terminations, criminal prosecutions and huge civil suits. And, assuming that the officers involved acted outside the scope of their duties, their department and municipality will not defend them.
10 posted on
12/06/2008 11:10:12 PM PST by
Enterprise
(No Presidency for illegal aliens from Kenya.)
To: Inappropriate Laughter
To: KoRn; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
21 posted on
12/07/2008 5:41:51 AM PST by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Inappropriate Laughter
24 posted on
12/07/2008 8:28:15 AM PST by
zeugma
(Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
To: Inappropriate Laughter
Every affidavit in support of application for search warrant I have ever seen contained outrageous exaggerations and and often fabrications . When proven to be false , the cops lay the blame on the informant , questioned , the informants will deny making the statements , prosecutors and judges , usually former prosecutors , will say “ hey what do you expect , informants are liars “. Ask any of your local judges how often they turn down requests for search warrants due to insufficiency of probable cause . Never . Put some wine down their necks and they will admit they don't even read them before signing .
25 posted on
12/07/2008 9:06:58 AM PST by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F/8 Cav)
To: Inappropriate Laughter
To: Inappropriate Laughter
32 posted on
12/11/2008 4:00:06 PM PST by
ebiskit
(South Park Republican ( I see Red People ))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson