Skip to comments.
SCOTUS Re: Obama....Live Thread
Posted on 12/05/2008 6:33:15 AM PST by maineman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 801-805 next last
To: littlehouse36
As if John Conyers would have proposed anything that would benefit a Republican, even Arnold Schwartzenegger.
161
posted on
12/05/2008 8:55:53 AM PST
by
kalee
To: jcsjcm
But didn’t we own Panama at the time?
Or was it just the canal?
162
posted on
12/05/2008 8:56:38 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: FreeAtlanta
Because this is America, and we can do it. Would you prefer the crowd carry pitchforks? Uh, yes! Upon reflection I think pitchforks and torches on the steps of CitiBank with demands for "return the money" and "bring out Robert Rubin and the rest of you can go home alive" would be excellent.
163
posted on
12/05/2008 8:56:47 AM PST
by
Jack Black
(ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
To: kalee
What time will the case be heard? anybody know?
To: Jack Black
It wasn't my citation and as I said this was a murky situation for McCain of which the Democrats thought they needed to add a clause accepting him as a Natural born citizen.
As far as my feeling on the matter there is no one more qualified to be a natural born citizen than John McCain. He was born while his father was serving our country and by 2 US citizens. So, it wasn't my citation! Sorry, but I've been blogging non-stop for 3 months at a rate of about 18 hrs per day and I'm too tired today to find that stupid passage from Obama and Hillary.
Could some kind FReeper give the link?
166
posted on
12/05/2008 9:00:34 AM PST
by
jcsjcm
(Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
To: Scythian
Every child bears the genes of both parents. To only consider "one" as the basis of "qualification" FOR THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE LAND...is minimizing the qualification.
LOYAL AMERICAN PARENTS ONLY!!
167
posted on
12/05/2008 9:00:56 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
To: maineman
168
posted on
12/05/2008 9:01:12 AM PST
by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: netmilsmom
Panama would still be a foreign country. We never “owned” the country.
169
posted on
12/05/2008 9:01:21 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Sacajaweau
Every child bears the genes of both parents. To only consider "one" as the basis of "qualification" FOR THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE LAND...is minimizing the qualification. LOYAL AMERICAN PARENTS ONLY!!
Especially knowing the motivations of his mother. Egads, I wouldn't consider her to have America in her best interest.
170
posted on
12/05/2008 9:03:25 AM PST
by
jcsjcm
(Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
To: netmilsmom
It doesn’t matter where McCain was born. He was born to two married citizens, and was therefore a citizen from Birth. AKA: Natural Born Citizen.
171
posted on
12/05/2008 9:03:28 AM PST
by
Jack Black
(ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
To: maineman
172
posted on
12/05/2008 9:05:24 AM PST
by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: Aquinasfan
As far as I am concerned any child born anywhere on earth whose parents are out of the U.S.A. due to military service should automatically be declared a
U.S. citizen.
173
posted on
12/05/2008 9:06:24 AM PST
by
NellieMae
(Here...... common sense,common sense,common sense,where'd ya go... common sense......)
To: Jack Black
174
posted on
12/05/2008 9:06:55 AM PST
by
Free America52
(I just want it to be the way it always has been.)
To: DJ MacWoW
From Wikipedia: “In 1953, Congress passed legislation to specify the status of Americans born in the Canal Zone—and to exclude non-Americans born there from citizenship. Title 8, Section 1403 of the United States Code[5] grants citizenship to those born in the Canal Zone with at least one parent who is a United States citizen. This differs from the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment which grants citizenship to all born in the United States, regardless of parental nationality.”
Note “at least one parent” clause. This made it easier to be natural born in the Canal Zone than in Kenya, for instance.
175
posted on
12/05/2008 9:07:09 AM PST
by
Jack Black
(ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
To: maineman; Admin Moderator
Why did n’t you post this on the main forum?
All live threads are posted there?
Perhaps you can ask the Admin Moderator to switch it.
176
posted on
12/05/2008 9:07:44 AM PST
by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: All
Not sure why
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
just updated their site to include this, since it is already common knowledge to us and the reason Leo is fighting the natural born clause, but I'll post this new update anyway! Just in case some of you don't know!
THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION
Posted in Uncategorized on December 5, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
At Barack Obamas web site, the following admission: FactCheck.org Clarifies Baracks Citizenship
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children
Read that last line again.
That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children
Thats an admission that Great Britain governed the status of Barack Obama, Jr. Brack Obama has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZENS STATUS BE GOVERNED BY GREAT BRITAIN?
A natural born citizens status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.
177
posted on
12/05/2008 9:08:55 AM PST
by
jcsjcm
(Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
To: DJ MacWoW
Shows how stupid I am.
Back to the history books!!!
178
posted on
12/05/2008 9:12:08 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: jcsjcm
Simple to understand: Just because a foreign nation also gives someone citizenship does not mean they can control US citizenship. In other words, just because Obama’s dad was British by means of being a Keynan, and they granted Obama British citizenship regardless of where he is born or to whom, does not mean the Brits cancel out any citizenship Obama may have been granted by any other nation. This means having a British citizenship is useless information regarding Obama’s birth in Kenya or the US.
To: PBRSTREETGANG
“Mr. Obama, you really cant produce a valid U.S. birth certificate Kenya?”
LOL!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 801-805 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson