Listen friend. If you honestly want to know the answer to your questions as badly as you're pretending, then you'd find the answers yourself, or consult someone other than an ordinary citizen expressing his personal views on a website.
I admitted to you three posts back that I may have spoken in error, but you continue to try to back me into a corner over this legal question.
You know I'm not a legal scholar, and it's quite possible that you aren't either, so what's your real intention here?
I have my opinion, however it was formed. I'm not a walking encyclopedia of legal facts, and don't have every reference I've read to hand, nor have I committed their locations to memory. I've read what I've read, and am speaking as frankly and truthfully as I can, with what I've digested.
So you don't know why you agree with Donofrio? He opposed Obama so that was enough for you, you signed on without even understanding his positions? You are aware, are you not, that by Donofrio's definion McCain isn't eligible to be president either?
You know I'm not a legal scholar, and it's quite possible that you aren't either, so what's your real intention here?
My intent is to get a question answered; What is the difference between born at birt and natural born? I'm not aware of anything that defines it and was hoping that someone like you, who seems to have swallowed Donofrio's theory hook, line, and sinker, might be able to answer it. Obviously I was wrong.