Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

I would love to believe they will.

I am saying —out of sheer workman-like pragmatism in avoiding the firestorm and probable civil unrest, they will vote to not open the suit—not that this would ever be their stated rationale EVER—it would be based on ‘lack of standing’ again.

NOW, Alan Keyes can probably argue that he was personally damaged by Obama’s duplicity...so will watch that case.


19 posted on 12/03/2008 4:27:15 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: dascallie
I am saying —out of sheer workman-like pragmatism in avoiding the firestorm and probable civil unrest,

I hope someone points out that to give Obama an office to which he is not entitled for the purpose of avoiding riots would be, quite literally, to surrender the Constitution to mob rule.

51 posted on 12/03/2008 4:40:23 PM PST by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie
I am saying —out of sheer workman-like pragmatism in avoiding the firestorm and probable civil unrest, they will vote to not open the suit—

Then, all is lost, and what's left of the Republic may as well surrender to Marxism now, if you believe that.

76 posted on 12/03/2008 4:55:48 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson