Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed

Yes, that is sort of why, as irked as I get by the propoganda that is spewing from MSM and the lies involved in this, I am at least happy they are mentioning it.

So if and when it ever sees the light of day at the SCOTUS, people will realize it has been issue for a while.


5 posted on 12/03/2008 7:05:06 AM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine

Eventually, people like Rush MAY pick it up. The Republican/Conservative elites have been strangely silent about the whole issue.


20 posted on 12/03/2008 7:15:57 AM PST by PghBaldy (I shall call him President Little Squirt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Instead of grumbling that they published a piece pooh-poohing the issue, we should be thrilled that the issue is getting coverage (this isn’t intended for you, AR; your comment indicates that you agree with this point)..

We need to send letters to the editor explaining why the facts as laid out in the article are not correct. Democracy at its best involves laying out information before the voters. Doubtless at least one of the letters will be published and the truth will get greater exposure.


67 posted on 12/03/2008 8:19:11 AM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson