I don't know how to do a screen grab. Would someone be so kind as to post a screen grab?
Everybody go ahead and post a comment under their article refuting this story. It’s free and easy and will get the message out. I posted this:
“Another thing: On this “Certificate of Live Birth” (not a birth certificate) it says “ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE”. Yet it has an alteration: The certificate number is blacked out. So, by the statement on the certificate, it’s not a valid certificate. “
The Chicago Tribune has posted an invalid certificate to prove that Obama is valid.
“An anti-tax activist from upstate New York who is questioning whether President-elect Barack Obama is a “natural born citizen” eligible for the nation’s top job said Tuesday that his non-profit group spent “tens of thousands of dollars” to get his message across in ads in the Chicago Tribune this week. “
And if our media were honest, the next sentence would be:
“...And Obama has spent $800,000 in legal fees so he can avoid paying $12 to provide a certified copy of his birth certificate.”
WTF does this MF have to hide?
I find it very amusing that the “birth certificate” has in its lower left corner a Revision date of 11/01 (Nov 2001?) and the word LASER - not even Dick Tracey comics had lasers in 1961!!!!
Flat out LIES from the Tribune..
They write .. “If a child is born in the United States—as Hawaiian officials state that Obama was”...
That is patently FALSE.
Can they name those officials that categorically stated that he was “born in Hawaii”??
Thought not.
Officials would be violating privacy laws had they said such a thing.
What officials HAVE stated is that Obama’s original birth certificate exists and is in compliance with all laws and procedures of the State of Hawaii.
In fact they write..
“Initially, Hawaiian officials said that privacy laws prevented them from releasing a copy or confirming that Obama’s copy was authentic. But in late October as questions persisted, Hawaii’s health director and head of vital statistics reviewed Obama’s birth certificate in the department’s vault and vouched for its authenticity.”
That is NOT the same thing as saying he was born there and does not even imply such.
In 1961, foreign born children of Hawaii residents could be registered with the State. Therefore it is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE for Barack 0bama to have an “authentic” legal Hawaiian birth certificate in full compliance with all Hawaiian Laws and procedures but still NOT be a “natural born citizen” under the Constitution, therefore the statements of Hawaii’s officials shed no light whatsoever on Obama’s eligibility to serve as President, nor can they by law.
If domain names like TheTruth.org, or FinalAuthority.org are available, then someone should grab them and post the Obama Truth File on them.
Then go to your Microsoft Paint program and select “edit” and ‘paste’. There it is!
Go to ‘save as’, select a name and be sure to change the selection to ‘jpg’ and you have it saved. I crop in another program.
One thing I’ve noticed is that when this issue is covered by the MSM they seem to only want to talk about Berg’s case. No mention is ever made of Keys’ lawsuit, or Donofrio’s (the latter of which is before SCOTUS, too - tomorrow I think?).
Anyway, it seems they are picking the least solid of all the cases still open, and when people hear (if) Berg’s case is scuttled, then they will assume the issue over and done with. I wish some of these reporters would look beyond those who they are receiving money from - the ones they are trying to protect themselves in reference to in this article, too.
I got a kick of how they quoted a spokesman for their paper in their own article without naming him - ROFL... What’s one to do when one becomes the news instead of just the medium? I know Obama has most likely threatened them now with his “Truth Squads” and all - or else there are a few die-hard Obamaniacs at the Tribune, too - or both! LOL
{Hope you’re doing well, Velveeta - LR)
America, meet your new, soon to be, masters. You've allowed your government and monied interests to transfer many trillions of dollars, to your enemies and _friends_ around the world. This wasn't reciprocal, those dollars, representing your wealth, are now theirs.
You've allowed those same dollars to return and influence your government, institutions, news services and corporations, to increase the outpouring of wealth. Those foreign dollars now own large, often controlling shares of said organizations. What used to be your institutions, now make decisions in the best interests of their new owners, not we the peoples.
The new owners refused to allow USA to use its own oil or keep its own manufacturing, preferring to move these essential and profitable items to their homelands. This was done under hundreds of different disguises and proxies agents.
The outpouring of wealth is so vast that now foreigners subtly fund the President and congressional campaigns and there isn't anything that can be done about it. As a matter of fact there nary a word of honest journalism regarding it; new owners hired new editors and journalists.
Now the US Treasury vault, has been thrown open to protect the financial losses of foreign capital invested in USA. Of course there is plenty of plunder for all of those who've been aiding and abetting the transfer of wealth.
Now, since a large portion of the new owners are Muslims, they will bring Sharia law or any other change, regardless of whether any one of we the people, likes it... Did I mention the new masters expect USA to make illegal immigration, legal and not create a big hassle about it? Essential for ending the dwindling patriotic majority.