Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: griswold3
The term "constitutional convention" is not quite correct. The Constitution refers to "A Convention for Proposing Amendments...as Part of This Constitution".

There is a difference. Read the essay for details.

10 posted on 12/01/2008 1:32:05 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

WE understand all that.
But to ‘change’ our founding documents, the opposition needs to scrap the whole thing and start over.
That’s why they are calling for a ‘Constitutional Convention’...for a NEW document.

Will report further, I am taking a class on the subject,”Does the US need a new Constitution?” You’d be surprised that some in the class DO think it’s time to scrap the old one to be ‘progressive’...


13 posted on 12/01/2008 1:38:33 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Publius
There is a difference. Read the essay for details.

Yes there is, but the first Constitutional Convention was originally called to amend the Articles of Confederation. Instead they created a whole new, and much more powerful, government.

That's so 18th century though. Today they just ignore the old rag and do what they can get away with.

19 posted on 12/01/2008 2:03:18 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson