Posted on 11/30/2008 11:28:57 PM PST by Oyarsa
My syndicated column today expands on yesterday’s eHarmony post (link). As I note, eHarmony will be forking over $5,000 to the gay plaintiff and $50,000 to New Jersey’s Civil Rights office. Here’s the entire settlement the company agreed to, via onlinedatingmagazine. There’s more on the class-action lawsuit against eHarmony proceeding in California here. And Jacob Sullum weighs in.
*** The eHarmony shakedown by Michelle Malkin Creators Syndicate Copyright 2008
Congratulations, tolerance mau-mauers: Your shakedown of a Christian-targeted dating website worked. Homosexuals will no longer be denied the inalienable “right” to hook up with same-sex partners on eHarmony. What a landmark triumph for social progress, eh? New Jersey plaintiff Eric McKinley can now crown himself the new Rosa Parks — heroically breaking down inhumane barriers to Internet matchmaking by forcing a law-abiding private company to provide services it was never created to provide.”Men seeking men” has now been enshrined with “I have a dream” as a civil rights rallying cry of the 21st century. Bully for you, Mr. McKinley. You bully.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
People are not required to pay to take the test or register with eHarmony.
You cannot communicate with your matches without paying your membership dues, but you can receive matches, view matches, and post a photo of yourself without paying.
That’s not how they operate; noone is required to pay to take the test or receive or view matches.
Payment is required to communicate with one’s matches on eHarmony.
It’s not true. eHarmony does not require payment until users get to the point that they are ready to communicate with their matches.
Yes, that is correct. I am sure that, in time, homosexual activists will want to use the heterosexual service, however.
It's not about acceptance. It's about power and control.
Their lives are so lacking in anything truly meaningful, that the only way they can build themselves up is to tear down the accomplishments of others.
Kinda like the anti-smoking crowd.
Mein life sucks! Zat much iss true!
I vill noot shtopp 'till yours sucks, too!
eHarmony should have shut it’s doors. Let the straights know why.
“We could not in good conscience allow our company to become a tool for the homosexual community. This is a Christian organization.”
Don’t you know that dog shows are an exercise in species-ism?
Now,they wouldn’t do what they accuse others of doing,would they? Why, that would make the sodomites and their liberal allies hypocrites! That’s impossible(snicker)!
You’re right; come to think of it, our government is also speciest.
Who are our elected officials to say that, for instance, a horse wouldn’t be a better senator than Durbin or Kennedy?
Evidence:
http://www.eharmony.com/singles/servlet/homePage
“Join eHarmony today and get your FREE Compatibility Profile!
See why eHarmony’s compatibility matching has produced so many loving, lasting relationships. Take the eHarmony Personality Profile and get instant, objective feedback on yourself and how you relate to others. Then read your FREE Compatibility Profile and find out who is right for you. With this information you will be ready to start receiving matches from eHarmony’s patented Compatibility Matching System. “
See also:
http://www.eharmony.com/tour/finding
According to their own testimony, they will search for matches prior to payment.
Does that mean others can call you a breeder? :-)
(I keed, I keed!)
(/joke)
I don’t want to even think about the 7 levels of compatability.
Naturally, they sued in NJ and CA. Guaranteed win in those states that don’t recognize a private business owner’s rights compared to preferred ‘minorities,’ that even legitimate minorities don’t recognize as such.
lmao... Nobody is calling me a breeder to my face. I have a very bad attitude!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.