Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Blade
Er, no, that is not what natural born means.

To those who wrote the naturalization laws in the 1790s, a "natural born" citizen was one who was born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens whether here or abroad. In the mid-1790s it was rewritten so that those born abroad were citizens as opposed to "natural born" citizens.
81 posted on 11/30/2008 7:20:21 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan
To those who wrote the naturalization laws in the 1790s, a "natural born" citizen was one who was born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens whether here or abroad.

The 1790 law dealt with citizens born overseas. It imposed no requirement that someone born in the US needed to be born to two citizens to be considered natural-born.

In the mid-1790s it was rewritten so that those born abroad were citizens as opposed to "natural born" citizens.

The re-written law does not mention the term natural-born. However, that does not mean the US has three categories of citizen- US law only recognizes two categories of citizen: naturalized (who do not qualify to be President) and citizen from birth (who do).

109 posted on 11/30/2008 7:37:06 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson