Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FTA:

The same GOP establishment that mocked and reviled Dr. Paul now lies shattered. Who believes in this Republican Party anymore? The party destroyed itself with its own unprincipled recklessness, both in foreign and fiscal policy. And it has ruined its reputation among the young – the most ardent of Dr. Paul's supporters, incidentally – who are far more likely to identify with the Democrats.

Out of this destruction, some creative young conservatives may rise up and decide to take back the Republican Party. Perhaps they'll run against the overweening power of the federal government and in favor of decentralizing power (but unlike today's Republicans, they'll actually mean it). Maybe they'll fight for an America that lives responsibly, within its natural limits both overseas and at home. And maybe, just maybe, they might make the Republican Party worth following again.

BUMP!

1 posted on 11/30/2008 11:16:36 AM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: rabscuttle385

http://www.metimes.com/Security/2008/11/21/commentary_nostradamus_redux/ce3c/

Check this out. Gerald Celente predicting a third party by 2012.


45 posted on 11/30/2008 12:13:12 PM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385; Allegra
Imagine Ron Paul as president of the United States.

What would Paul do with that power?

We would become a banana Republic....ooops!

I almost forgot!....Obama is also bringing a banana Republic.

Well coulda....shoulda......Banana Republics ...are all the same.

Thanks for crashing the Republican convention Ron. Great way to get public support.

48 posted on 11/30/2008 12:16:49 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Article: Dr. Paul has long argued that an economy built on easy credit, insatiable consumption and deficit spending is a time bomb. He backs a national economic model based on savings, investment and production.

I back that economic model, as well. The problem, of course, is centered around the majority of Americans who can't borrow, buy, and save responsibly. It doesn't matter what Dr. Paul argues against. IMHO, three basic groups of voters are driving politics.

One bunch wants handouts for the "wealthy," another wants handouts for the "poor," and the third wants the government to save their 401(k)'s. And all three could not care less how much money the department of the Treasury needs to print to accomplish this madness.

It will be interesting, if I live long enough, to see just how far this idiocy will proceed. Whatever, Dr. Paul- or any other politician- is not going to stop the stupidity that has now become the USSA- United Socialist States of America. Hard times and the threat of imminent destruction might wake up the mob, but I'm not sure about that.
61 posted on 11/30/2008 1:15:49 PM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

I voted for Ron Paul every chance I had...except the last. I won’t let that exception occur in the future.


62 posted on 11/30/2008 1:16:23 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“Rod Dreher: Ron Paul, if only we listened”

The problem was not Ron Paul, it was the cereal brigade that was the most vocal of his supporters, and that kind of kookery rubs off eventually on the candidate. Heck, he even validated the kooks by going on the radio show of their pied piper leader. It is really sad because he had some very good ideas especially where the economy is concerned.


63 posted on 11/30/2008 1:28:01 PM PST by Grunthor (bush04 - 62, 040, 610 mccain08 - 58, 164, 693.......Moving left is NOT the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Ron Paul is just another clueless surrender monkey indistinguishable as regards national security from the Party of Treason.


64 posted on 11/30/2008 1:29:21 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Out of this destruction, some creative young conservatives may rise up and decide to take back the Republican Party. Perhaps they'll run against the overweening power of the federal government and in favor of decentralizing power (but unlike today's Republicans, they'll actually mean it). Maybe they'll fight for an America that lives responsibly, within its natural limits both overseas and at home. And maybe, just maybe, they might make the Republican Party worth following again.

Ping to read later

81 posted on 11/30/2008 2:17:23 PM PST by Alex Murphy ( "Every country has the government it deserves" - Joseph Marie de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

How come you didn’t mention any conservatives in your post?


98 posted on 11/30/2008 2:59:42 PM PST by USAFJeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
nor did I write him in on Election Day (I penciled in farmer-poet Wendell Berry).

Well, fat lot of good that did...for Barabbas.

106 posted on 11/30/2008 3:22:32 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Whatever happened to all that money he took in?


112 posted on 11/30/2008 3:42:07 PM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385; CyberAnt; Gary Johnson in 2012; Drango; Species8472
Ron Paul was right in opposing the 1999 NATO Bombing of Yugoslavia, and that was "a foreign policy decision". He was one of the few to be so vocal and active in opposing it.

Ron Paul was right about the economy and predicted the economic crisis.

Ron Paul is right about the corruption & cronyism in DC.

But some people here want Bush III, or McCain II.

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."

Yet you can never successfully argue with lunatics.

113 posted on 11/30/2008 3:48:30 PM PST by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Paul is 100% Open Borders.

He wants to change and remove the reason they come here.

As a Californian I recall voting for that in prop 187.

Guess what the courts did?


176 posted on 11/30/2008 10:38:43 PM PST by NoLibZone (To All those that have sworn the Oath- Time Has Come. Or your service has been for the benefits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Paulbots still can't admit that they were working in league with the Obamanoids.

Don't expect forgiveness from the GOP - or acceptance from the Democrats.

The GOP will rebuild with or without you and RP.

BTW, anyone seen RP lately? His constituents sure haven't.

182 posted on 11/30/2008 11:02:30 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
>>>>>The same GOP establishment that mocked and reviled Dr. Paul now lies shattered<<<<<

Weed out Trotskysts out of the GOP.

194 posted on 12/01/2008 9:00:18 AM PST by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Paul is spot on.....about everything, including Iraq.

We're going to learn the same lesson there that we're now learning the hard way about this debt-drowned economy. We've spent untold billions of dollars and over three thousand American lives to turn Iraq into a Christian-free zone and eventually, an Islamic republic.

Unfortunately, Paul's idiosyncratic mannerisms, his uncoached and uncultivated appearance, squeaky voice and overall disdain for media-friendly traits means he'll forever be tagged with the "kook" or "geek" label.

195 posted on 12/01/2008 9:20:19 AM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future"- Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ..
Lord knows there was no Republican in the 2008 campaign who talked straighter.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
196 posted on 12/01/2008 10:40:18 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drango

Those newsletters weren’t so much as racist as they were simply politically incorrect but the hard truth. They’re only “racist” if you’re using Al Sharpton’s judgment.


228 posted on 12/01/2008 3:20:09 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson