Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
I know where you coming from then. Play many computer simulations with Medieval Armies and the Mongols are the most difficult to take on, without a doubt. I thought that your ancestors were the Rus or the Novgorod. I have been simulating controlling my first Islamic Army. The Abbasid culture. Based in Baghdad at the time. The Kingdom of Jerusalem attacked me, and let me say that they asked for a ceasefire. Took out quite a few of their armies.

The most difficult scenario was the Knights Templar. Lost many Knights battling Cataphracts, but won the campaign eventually. Still have not figured out how to take on the Mongols. I have been mostly avoiding them in previous simulations. Fighting them at a river bridge crossing or besieging them within a city at least gives you a chance. In the open field, they are most difficult.

214 posted on 11/29/2008 10:26:29 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]


To: justa-hairyape

In reality, Abbasid v. Mongols, the Abbasid will (and did) lose. Badly. Inferior equipment, bad to non-existent tactics, terrible leadership, up against, well, the Horde, who could give modern armies lessons in discipline.

Generally speaking, yeah, your best bet against the Khan’s tactics would be to take and hold a chokepoint or beseige a city, as you’ve already found out. Failing that, a reverse Trojan Horse might work.


215 posted on 11/29/2008 10:37:24 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson