Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mumbai terror killers are British
News.Com.Au ^

Posted on 11/29/2008 10:17:15 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Frantzie

Sheffield, UK, as well.


21 posted on 11/29/2008 10:42:30 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mathurine

“lend them some Marines to clean out these pens of misbegotten mohammedan swine?”

Doubt prez-elect 0 will approve !


22 posted on 11/29/2008 10:44:55 AM PST by Indian_Fighter_Kite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
It's true that they are British. This is useful information, and worth noting.

However, the really important thing to note is that they were MUSLIM.

Very true. There are many Westerners -- even many Freepers -- still trying to think of these sick perverted thugs as terrorists first and muzzies second.

That's wrong. The muzzie book preaches death to 'non-believers' and slavery for women.

These slime are muzzies first, last and always... they just happen to be muzzies who are practicing what their 'religion' preaches.

Now I know, there are many who say "can't declare war on 1/4 of the human race".

That might be true. But you can't deny facts, unless you want to become insane, like the liberals.

And the fact IS, that these scum bags were only doing what their RELIGIOUS LEADERS and their RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE tells them to do.

Deny it all you want. It doesn't change the FACT.

23 posted on 11/29/2008 10:50:34 AM PST by samtheman (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marron

“Pakistanis can probably enter India more easily if they carry British passports.”

Well, they didn’t exactly come in through customs with a tour group, so I’m not sure that’s really a factor here. One would assume there are more Brit/Euro passport carrying bad guys that were infiltrated ahead for support/planning/recon/etc.

K.


24 posted on 11/29/2008 10:53:18 AM PST by KitJ (Shall Not Be Infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Could it be that the UK wants to reconquer their old colony?

Doubtful. They do not appear determined to retain their original island.

25 posted on 11/29/2008 10:54:19 AM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Don’t forget about IN....Plainfield houses the largest publisher of Muslim literature in the world..... The FBI is very well aware of sects in Bloomington, Plainfield and Carmel......


26 posted on 11/29/2008 10:54:59 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They’re “Asian”.


27 posted on 11/29/2008 10:55:03 AM PST by PoliticalDookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Britain needs to let in a bunch more mohamedens.

Then give them a place to stay, at taxpayer expense.

Then give them a few thousand pounds a month to live on, at taxpayer expense.

Then give them free health care ala the NHS, at taxpayer expense.

Then give them free food coupons, at taxpayer expense.

Then give them the money to buy a church, raze it to the ground and build a mosque, at taxpayer expense.

Then buy them all kind of VCR and computer equipment, at taxpayer expense.

Then just do nothing, exactly as they're doing now so that the muslims have nothing to do with their time all day, every day, but to sit around mosque and plot how to kill more and more taxpayers.

They're going out of country and killing other infidels? better and better, long as they're not killing brits.

Yet.

This is the way it's working now so why change a working system?

/sarc (if it's needed)

The West is doing more to foster islamic terrorism (but I repeat myself) than all of islam combined.

28 posted on 11/29/2008 10:59:47 AM PST by ConservativeCompendium.net (We need to amend the US Constitution. We the People --> We the Politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
And England, in historical fashion, will not ask for help until the country is overrun by Mooselimbs and beheadings in the streets of “infidels” are a daily occurrence.
29 posted on 11/29/2008 11:09:20 AM PST by LiberConservative (Typical white guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Mumbai terror killers are British”

Headline fairly screams “Nothing Muslim to see here!”
Nevertheless...
Not British. Insofar as the British are still British, these devils are certainly not.

Mumbai terror killers are Muslim would be correct and informative, and that’s two reasons right there why it didn’t make the cut.


30 posted on 11/29/2008 11:09:37 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

After January 2009 - the FBI will only go after anyone who says bad things about Islam and IslamoFacism. Americans will be on the FBI’s watch lists - Muslims will get a free pass.


31 posted on 11/29/2008 11:10:46 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If Europe had the backbone to do it perhaps it is time to deport back to the counties of origin anyone who has emigrated from Islamic countires in the past 30 years to include all children born in those countires. Yes it will probably include many innocent people but it would be for the “greater good” of all.


32 posted on 11/29/2008 11:16:46 AM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Top official denies Mumbai attackers were British

Reuters - Sunday, November 30 MUMBAI - Maharashtra state chief minister said on Saturday that there was no evidence of British citizens being involved in the attacks in Mumbai.

"There is no such authentic information, we totally deny this," Vilasrao Deshmukh told reporters when asked if there were any British citizens involved in the attacks.

33 posted on 11/29/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Sadly, this may be true my friend.....


34 posted on 11/29/2008 11:37:22 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba
.. include many innocent people,

better their's than ours...

.,it's gonna be one or the other sooner or later...

35 posted on 11/29/2008 11:39:24 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I would like to get a debate going. Especially with any neocons out there and it needs to go down. Especially now that we are living in the BarracK H Obama era.

My thesis: The 2 principal LOCI of 21st Century Islamic Terrorism.

PAKISTAN, based in Islamabad.

BIRMINGHAM, UK

We need to have an intervention on the UK ( You have a problem . You breed terrorists! Why? )

Is it the bad British food!

36 posted on 11/29/2008 11:44:41 AM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Mumbai terror killers are British”

How ironic. They have something in common with Obama (and drives home the problem with "dual citizenship" and "divided loyalties"):

If you click through to Factcheck.org , a more detailed discussion as to why Obama was a British citizen at birth explains the relevant statutes:

"When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:

British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.


37 posted on 11/29/2008 11:57:14 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m sure the BBC is running stories blaming white UKers for not instituting Sharia Law fast enough.


38 posted on 11/29/2008 12:02:08 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
It's true that they are British. This is useful information, and worth noting.
However, the really important thing to note is that they were MUSLIM.

You are correct. The Muslims didn't kill those Indians because England was having a beef with India

They killed those Indians and others because they are Infidels.

This isn't about countries; it is about the religious beliefs of the fundamental Muslims. - Tom

39 posted on 11/29/2008 12:16:31 PM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Where is Obama on this Mumbai Massacre? It's been 2 years of the media screeching "Obama Obama", yet when the chips fall, he is nowhere to be found!

Is he still intent on standing with the Muslims after such bloodshed?


40 posted on 11/29/2008 12:21:23 PM PST by magooey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson