The 21at Amendment went through the amendment process, rather than a repeal by Congress, or worse, by a President or by five Justices of the Supreme Court. Once the 21at was duly ratified, then it was in the constitutional stature to strike down the Prohibition Amendment, however that was phrased.
John / Billybob
Right. But the author of this article (wrongheaded as she is) is not advocating for a repeal by Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court. She is advocating for the repeal of the natural born citizen requirement
by amending the Constitution. The result she seeks is improper, motivated by a dangerous notion of the role of globalization in domestic law, and her proposal would do great harm to this country. However, she seeks to implement this dreadful goal through the proper process, amendment of the Constitution.
Just look at the title of the article: "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement . . ."