Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

RUSH: Okay, first off, the corporate jets. It's a moot issue now because these guys have announced that they're going to carpool to Washington for the next round of hearings when they present their term paper. Now, bank executives skipping their bonuses. When he says, "I think that if you're already worth tens of millions of dollars and you're having to lay off workers, the least you can do is say, 'I'm willing to make some sacrifice as well because I recognize that there are people who are a lot less well off who are going through some pretty tough times.'" Here's the sad thing about that. This is as meaningless and as pointless as worrying where the moon is right now, except if you're interested in tides. It is just pointless. You could take all of these bonuses, you could take the salaries of the Big Three and their bonuses and all these Wall Street firms, and you could pool that money together, and it wouldn't lower the price of gasoline a dime. It wouldn't help. It's not going to elevate any employee's income at any of these places. Yet people fall for this because "fairness, fairness, fairness" is how the liberals pursue their agenda, because who's opposed to fairness?
1 posted on 11/28/2008 12:34:03 AM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom

Obama is a fake and phoney. If I were these executives; I would ignore him.


2 posted on 11/28/2008 12:52:12 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

“...the only beneficiaries of this are people like Obama and Ted Kennedy and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and other Big-Government liberals who are getting what they want outta all this, and that is not even more money. You start raising taxes on people and the money to the Treasury shrinks because a lot of little guys are going to get laid off and fired. No, what they like about it is the cementing of power and specifically securing a little bit more loss of individual liberty and freedom because these people are about empowering themselves, and once they get it, holding onto it. “


3 posted on 11/28/2008 12:55:14 AM PST by ari-freedom (Thank you for everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

Obama is a dangerous fool. :-(

How is it possible that such a dunce was elected president??
I’d be shocked if his IQ is much above average.... we deserve better than a man who cannot dare let his school records see the light of day.

we are doomed, doomed I tell you.


5 posted on 11/28/2008 1:19:57 AM PST by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

B.O. opted out of public finance for his election.
He gathered $700 Million for his war chest and no one
question his lack of ethics!


6 posted on 11/28/2008 2:09:27 AM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

“You could take all of these bonuses, you could take the salaries of the Big Three and their bonuses and all these Wall Street firms, and you could pool that money together, and it wouldn’t lower the price of gasoline a dime.”

In my state, there’s a lot of hand-wringing over the $3.1 million paid to the president of Blue Cross Blue Shield, a non-profit corporation. This plan covers more than 3 million North Carolinians. In short, we COULD-in the name of “fairness”—tax 100% of this person’s compensation and plow the savings back into reduced premiums: of 8 cents per member per month!

It would be nice if the U.S. education system—which I presume is likely to be the most expensive per capita on the planet—would at least teach its students some basic critical thinking skills.


10 posted on 11/28/2008 4:56:34 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
Will he rip into people making six figures or even millions that never had a job in their lives? Will he rip into those making a living off of race baiting etc?
17 posted on 11/28/2008 5:17:28 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

The main reason these guys get the high salaries in the first place is that they set their own salaries. They should be required to get shareholder approval for their salaries. That would put an end to it.


19 posted on 11/28/2008 5:36:36 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
RUSH: Okay, first off, the corporate jets. It's a moot issue...

The thinking behind using corporate jets to get to Washington to ask for a bailout is probably the same thinking that is behind the need for a bailout in the first place - they're not good at understanding their customer base.

22 posted on 11/28/2008 7:14:20 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
I only start caring what the idiot CEOs make when they :

a. ship out all of the jobs so they can get a bonus.
b. require a government bailout.
29 posted on 11/28/2008 11:30:56 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
The mottos of Obama, as determined by observation of his actions, and his word: * * *


Malkin: Where are all the Anti-Inauguration activists now?

President Obama’s Chicago machine is kicking into high gear to plan and fund his massive, unprecedented inaugural festivities. He just appointed an inauguration planning committee that includes his hometown cronies William Daley and Penny Pritzker. They’ve got a campaign-style website counting down the days to the massive party in Washington. To deflect attention from the costs, the One’s party planners are patting themselves on the back for limiting inaugural donations to individual contributions of $50,000 — a move they say is historic. But Bill Clinton also refused corporate money for his second inaugural and capped donations at $100. (Bush raised $42 million for his second inaugural, mostly from corporate donors, capped at $250,000.) The DC Examiner recently reported that the Inaugural Celebrations of Hope and Change will strain the district’s beleaguered pocketbook:
Soaring costs expected to accompany huge crowds in town for the Jan. 20 inauguration of Barack Obama could stick cash-strapped Washington, D.C., with a record-breaking bill for services. Security and capacity measures recommended by the District’s congressional delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton and others will almost certainly surpass the $15 million the federal government gives to the District each year to defray the cost of events, Norton said.

32 posted on 11/28/2008 11:54:08 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson