Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Should End The Birth Certificate Controversy
The Bulletin ^ | 11/26/2008 | The Rev. Michael Bresciani

Posted on 11/27/2008 2:21:43 PM PST by ckilmer

11/26/2008
Obama Should End The Birth Certificate Controversy
By The Rev. Michael Bresciani, For The Bulletin

The question of whether Barack Obama was actually born in Kenya thus disqualifying him to run as a presidential candidate will not go away. It is like the little mushrooms that appear every morning under the tree, they keep coming back. What should the president-elect do?

It is not fair to label those who want answers as racists, disillusioned right-wingers, conspiracy nuts or any other convenient appellation thereby asking them to simply shut up. Lawsuits filed to require that an official vault document be produced have come from African-Americans, democrats and a host of constitutionally concerned citizens.

In fact one You Tube offering about the matter garnered 750,000 views alone and the total viewing of videos and articles on the subject is somewhere near 3 million to date.

The problems with the birth certificate offered on the extreme left Web site the Daily Kos and a few other Internet sites are too many to ignore. The short list is first that the document is not signed. Secondly, it has no seal. Third, is that the security border doesn't match similar documents from the same time period. Other objections are that the race of Mr. Obama's father is listed as African. In the early '60s the State of Hawaii listed African- Americans as Negroes.

What is missing from the document is the doctor's signature and physical characteristics at birth that every original birth certificate reveals.

Some interested party's have submitted the internet document to the scrutiny of Adobe and graphic experts who all agree the document is highly questionable or a complete fraud. Is it? Who knows at this point? What is far more intriguing is the resistance being thrown at uncovering the true vault document. This is what is spawning suspicion and doubt.

Attorney Philip Berg has filed a writ of certiorari that should force the president-elect, the DNC and co-defendants to produce the document in accordance with law. Ambassador Alan Keyes has pending suits and a total of 17 others are submitting their quests to various levels of state courts.

Here are the important reasons President-elect Obama should cooperate and put the whole matter to bed as quickly as possible.

Because he can. With a simple request to the Hawaii Bureau of Vital Statistics he can quash all doubt and get on with his administration.

He will remove the suspicions of millions of Americans, republicans, democrats and independents alike. If ignored it could cause a constitutional crises unlike anything ever seen in this country. It would make questions of chads and incomplete voting cards look like a kindergarten problem by contrast.

It will indicate that Mr. Obama means business when he takes the oath of office and declares that he will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. It will give confidence to many of his opponents who may not agree with all his policies, but want to know that he is a completely honest man with the country's best interest in mind.

It would put to rest the assertion that he is an elitist. All Americans must submit proper documentation of birth to get Social Security cards, driver's license, security clearance and passports. He should be willing to carry out the first and the least of all his campaign promises contained in the slogan "Yes, we can." In America we can and according to law "we must."

We will all sleep better at night!
It is a surprisingly simple matter to make it all go away but it is presently entrenched in court battles and suspicion. In a full page ad in the Washington Times Nov. 17, 2008 three questions are asked. Was Barack Obama born in Kenya? Is he really a citizen of Indonesia? Does the Constitution still matter?

Good questions, we're listening.

The Rev. Michael Bresciani is an author of "An American Prophet and His Message" and columnist for several online and print publications.

©The Bulletin 2008



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; spartansixdelta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last
To: ckilmer

How fitting are these anagrams for Barack Hussein Obama -

I, Arab sham, beckon USA.

O Arabic snake, ambush!!


101 posted on 11/27/2008 5:25:20 PM PST by doug from upland (8 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGPII
But we should have known before the election

Amazing that you are not asked to uphold the constitution and show your birth certificate when you register for the election. I don't think I have ever heard of such a blunder.

102 posted on 11/27/2008 5:26:44 PM PST by sazerac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I’m trying to keep it up front to remind people how to help kick Obongo’s a$$ out. I hope the Mods understand and don’t get after me about posting it so much.


103 posted on 11/27/2008 5:27:38 PM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Once he qualified for the ballot in 50 states and received nearly 67 million votes, its a little too late to challenge his qualifications. Besides, the state of Hawaii says his Certificate of Live Birth is on file. Obama’s got Hawaii state law on his side

James, you've been chiming in on these threads for a good while now, so I'm just curious as to why you're not actually absorbing all of the concrete realities and facts presented here.

The only statement you made above that is even partially true is that the state of Hawaii has a birth certificate on file for Obama, and even that one is not precisely accurate.

Why not spend some time really digesting the facts as presented, and the very well-formed arguments expressed here, instead of continuing to post falsehoods?

104 posted on 11/27/2008 5:30:48 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: A knight without armor

Well, Barky did refer to himself as a “mutt”.


105 posted on 11/27/2008 5:40:52 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs...nothing more than Bald Haired Hippies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
“The time to challenge Obama’s eligibility was at the qualifying for 50 states’ ballots plus the District of Columbia.”

This is the basis for one of the suits; the one to Justice Thomas that is to be conferenced on Dec. 5. The suit from the retired attorney from New Jersey asked his state's Sec. of State if she had seen Obama’s birth certificate, and was he actually qualified. She said, “no”; she thought someone before her had verified that he qualified as a “natural born citizen”. What concerns me about this is will the justices conference on who is to verify a candidate, or on whether Obama actually qualifies.

There is another suit that was brought before Justice Souter (I think). This suit was dismissed, but Obama or his campaign has to show by Dec. 1 that he qualifies (produce the birth certificate). It may be that the decision of that suit will affect the one of Dec. 5. If Obama stalls or refuses to reply/comply to Justice Souter’s decision, then what?

106 posted on 11/27/2008 5:42:43 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Michael Bresciani has written an excellent article. I trust the Justices of the Supreme Court will heed his plea.


107 posted on 11/27/2008 5:43:25 PM PST by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shady Ray

Let us hope that is the case.


108 posted on 11/27/2008 5:45:53 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Will he respond?


109 posted on 11/27/2008 5:47:10 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: All
Until the MSM picks up on this story the only place it'll get any play is sites like FR were a minority take it serious or places like DU were they just laugh it off as wishful thinking on the part of the right.
110 posted on 11/27/2008 5:52:21 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
"The time to challenge Obama’s eligibility was at the qualifying for 50 states’ ballots plus the District of Columbia. Once he qualified for the ballot in 50 states and received nearly 67 million votes, its a little too late to challenge his qualifications."

Not at all. The people who ultimately determine his qualifications are the Electors in each state.

"Besides, the state of Hawaii says his Certificate of Live Birth is on file."

Saying a "Certificate of Live Birth" is "on file" is NOT the same thing as releasing the information contained in said certificate (such as WHERE the birth took place).

"Obama’s got Hawaii state law on his side..."

Hawaii law means squat. It is up to Obama to prove his qualifications meet the requirements for "natural born citizenship". And any of the Electors who file suit (or are included as part of a suit) have "standing" to sue.

111 posted on 11/27/2008 5:53:07 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

If it is apparent beyond reasonable doubt that Hussein is not a natural born citizen, then we must look to any and all legal and constitutional actions to deny him the presidency. If the constitution of the US is not worth defending against mob rule, then nothing is. If we wish to preserve the republic, than we had best let the chips fall, and then sort them out. By whatever means necessary.

We who value the constitution will not allow the moral emphasis of this argument to be inverted. All this speculation, correct or not; has come about because this lying crypto-marxist thug from the most corrupt environs of leftist Chicago sewer politics has ascended to POTUS-elect status with the willing aquiescence of the MSM. The MSM was hell-bent on concealing this usurper’s background because they wanted him to be elected. Now, in a classic case of blame the messenger, those of us who belive in the constitution are being reviled for insisting that a POTUS comply with a basic requirement that most of us unhesitatingly conform with when seeking a driver’s license.

The arrogance and effrontery of this lying bastid is breathtaking. The founders knew that they were not natural born citizens, so they had to include language in Art II Sec 1 that exempted THEM. Does this fraud think that he is better than Washington, Madison, Adams, and Jefferson in that sense? Apparently he does, and with the acquiesence of enough people, he will suceed in usurping and corrupting the Executive Branch of government. This situation presents the very real posssibility of impelling this great nation beyond a constitutional crisis toward a civil war.

Finally, consider the implications of a man who would undertake these devious machinations to knowingly assume an office that he has no constitutional claim to, and than to see this same counterfeit president elect take an oath to defend that constitution. I believe that such a man would be willing to impose ANY sort or despotism or tyranny upon us to retain power.


112 posted on 11/27/2008 5:53:58 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Actually he will take office without proving it so now what?


113 posted on 11/27/2008 5:55:27 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
well he is probably an illegal alien

I suspect you are correct and that is why he is fighting it so desperately.

114 posted on 11/27/2008 5:56:07 PM PST by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

The MSM, as is now obvious, is the last place to look for truth, especially in regards to issues of politics, and how much more so in re Obama.


115 posted on 11/27/2008 5:59:05 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

HALLELULAH! Keep talking about it everyone until he shows it to the SCOTUS!


116 posted on 11/27/2008 5:59:29 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

You are required to be a US Citizen to get a passport. No one is questioning that he is a citizen. But to be POTUS, you must be Natural Born.


117 posted on 11/27/2008 5:59:58 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

Haven’t seen it addressed? You haven’t read the threads have you?

No, his father was not a US Citizen. In order for his mother to transfer “Natural Born” status to him, she must have been in the US for 10 years, 5 of which over the age of 16. She was only 18 when Obama was born, therefore she could not transfer her citizenship to him if he was not born in the US territory. She could of course get him citizenship later based on her status, but that does not make him Natural Born.


118 posted on 11/27/2008 6:02:11 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

As far as I know, all states did in the early 60’s.


119 posted on 11/27/2008 6:03:06 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

It seems he has used his US/Foreign history to gain alot over his life.

Now they are questioning his Selective Service Registration as just done this year. If he was a dual citizen with Kenya (as he admitted on his website) until the age of 21, was he required to register with the selective service at 18?

Hmmmm, people want to know.


120 posted on 11/27/2008 6:04:55 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson