Posted on 11/27/2008 1:26:22 AM PST by ScaniaBoy
They got his title wrong, it is Mr. Obama.
You mean Obama.
Thats because W's war in Iraq shut off Hussein's (Saddam) oil for food payments to the democrats.
“They got his title wrong, it is Mr. Obama.
You mean Obama.”
I have to laugh at my 86 year old grandfather. He’s still sharp as a tack, but he just CANNOT remember the new ‘president elect’s’ name.
He calls him ‘Obongo’. I’ve stopped correcting him.
I’ve decided I like it. It fits him. LOL
.
They should flatten the mountains Afghanistan in a month long , round the clock bombing raid and then come home.
Yea, I’m sure when he had his first security meeting they must have laid a big dose of reality on his ass , telling him about things none of us know about. Probably shook up the amateur Obama. I wouldn’t doubt he’s nervous as hell .
What’s the matter Barry , it’s a big bad world out there and you’re the leader. HAHHAHAH fraud that he is .
Please support our troops.
Oh I’m positive that the very moves that Bush made that were protested heavily by the left will be welcomed as brilliant when Obama pulls them off.The left are total frauds .
How many hundreds of thousands of innocent afghani citizens will be slaughtered by us forces as a result of this? /sarasm
Therefore I think your question is very relevant.
It is funny...not ha ha funny, but the other one! He looks and sounds very nervous, not a good thing to be when you’re the most powerful leader in the world and have millions upon millions of jihadists that want your butt toasted!
Looks like WE THE PEOPLE are going to have to fight this battle!
It is a losing battle with the amount of troops we have over there..but not sure 20,000 more will make a difference.’
20,000 more Predators might make a difference.......
Isn't it funny how he said a surge in Iraq would never work but now that he will be the one in charge(puke) he thinks we need a surge in Afghanistan.
‘Obongo’
LOL I like that too.
I have another for you. I call Chicago - “Chicongo”. The two certainly go together.
Also funny is the fact that he doesn't do his own thinking - he has to copy President "BUSH". Where is this brilliant (</sarcasm>) dunce's change, he was talking about.
I can see no other use for it except to be used against the American people to quell an uprising against the government. If it's a police force it is not government by the "Passe comitatus Act". nd would be controlled by the federal government (Obama).
We already have the State Police in Each State, the sheriff's police in each county, and city police in each city, all under local control.
I can see no other use for it except to be used against the American people to quell an uprising against the government. If it's a police force it is not governed by the "Passe comitatus Act". nd would be controlled by the federal government (Obama).
We already have the State Police in Each State, the sheriff's police in each county, and city police in each city, all under local control.
They should flatten the mountains Afghanistan in a month long , round the clock bombing raid and then come home.
The Russians tried that already.
LBJ already did that in Nam.
But as they say: History repeats itself.
> Don’t know whether this is a legitimate claim, but many people do see opportunity for personal gain in accidents.
It is the hallmark of Dictators worldwide and from time immemorial to establish a well-provisioned armed force loyal to them and to them only.
An early example of that was the Praetorian Guard.
This “Civilian Security Force” is His Excellency’s very own Praetorian Guard. What are the odds that, aside from being used against the populace, they will supplant the Secret Service and the Marines in Presidential guard duty?
I’d say he’d be silly not to do that. His Excellency is many things, but he is no fool.
> The Russians tried that already.
> LBJ already did that in Nam.
> But as they say: History repeats itself.
IMO wars are not won with bombs but with boot-leather. (Yes, that even applies to WW-II)
Somehow, someday, the time will come for somebody to send Infantry in to Afghanistan and take the place over, no matter how hard it gets bombed.
The infantry there right now is doing a good job: they are where they need to be. If anything they need more Infantry and fewer bombs, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.