In my last post I didn't mention the military once. We both agree on that.
The line between the military, and civil law enforcement needs to be bold and deep. Allowing the line to blur is a mistake.
I agree with this in principle, but the fact is that most sniper's in law enforcement have military experience and nowadays most will have experience pulling triggers in battle. That is an experience that is nearly impossible to divorce oneself from.
Ruby Ridge is an excellent example of why. Those serving on paramilitary teams need to be carefully screened for psychological suitability for that kind of assignment.
Of course they are. I think the problem is that so many are needed and the supply of supermen is critically low. It's also an unfortunate fact that the traits that make a good sniper are kind of scarce in mere mortals, especially the types of civilians who tend to score well on police psychological tests.
As you stated, the rules of engagement were amiss at Ruby Ridge, but the problen was exacerbated by the presence of two loose cannons on the team that welcomed the opportunity to run wild.
Agreed, but the oversight should be on the people who DIRECT the snipers, because when it's time; when the green light comes; it's no time to be second guessing oneself.
We don’t need any more “Wacos,” “Ruby Ridges,” or “Move Massacres.”
Agreed.
The "Move massacre?" Was that the one where the cops firebombed a whole city block in Detroit or Philly?
Yes, in Philly.
One of law enforcements sorriest moments.