I think you fired at a friendly here. Both are 100% naturalistic -- which is my point. I am not a physicist and cannot argue one over the other. I am knowledgeable about science and do know there is no place in it for ID or Creationism/miracles.
You cannot even define ID, yet you are certain that it has no place? Furthermore, your statement about Eistein replacing Newton cannot be further from the truth. Thus, if you do not understand physics, don’t make absurdly false statements about physics.
I do realize that I have insulted or may have insulted you on this point. But please, “Newton is the Man” as far as science and technology goes. Yes, much of his work breaks down at the extremes, but so does Einsteins when you look closely at it.