I was responding to your post.
"And for someone who spends all his time erecting strawmen, I find it singularly ironic you spend all your posts speaking of fallacies."
You think that pointing out fallacies in your thinking is a 'strawman'? As I have pointed out, multiple, serial fallacies are the very foundation of your belief-system. How can that be a 'strawman'? LOL!
I was responding to your post.
That doesn't answer the underlying question -- in responding to my post, you reinforce the idea of kinds.
You think that pointing out fallacies in your thinking is a 'strawman'? As I have pointed out, multiple, serial fallacies are the very foundation of your belief-system. How can that be a 'strawman'? LOL!
Ducking and weaving and positing a bunch of things that have nothing to do with the questions I ask is not "pointing out fallacies" -- it is merely building strawmen and then lighting them.
My question (still unanswered) was very simple -- it didn't need pph after pph of philosophical meanderings. I am sure you enjoyed posting them but they are just evading the issue.