Posted on 11/25/2008 9:00:34 AM PST by Maelstorm
There is definitely something fishy about his official documents.
He’s broken a law somewhere, and that’s why he’s hired 3 whole law FIRMS to fight the release of his information.
WHO REALLY IS THIS MAN? Toot died the day before the election. I wonder how many secrets she took to the grave with her and why BHO didn’t bother to attend her funeral. Another one thrown under the herse.
I thought a condition of getting federal aid for college was proving SS Registratration?
Not if you are a foreign student. ;-)
I’m not sure he ever got federal aid.
The Clintons know. I guarantee it.
He SAYS he got financial aid and had to pay it back, but is there any proof of that? I think his true financial aid came from one or more Arab/muslim benefactors. What was that guy's name who helped get him into Harvard?
He got Saudi aid, at the very least.
I think this guy is a quais-Manchurian Candidate.
I think you may be correct!
What are the questions?
he didn’t have the loans listed on either his taxes or some other document he had to release in order to run for office
maybe because he didn’t have loans?
Can it be proven that Stanley Ann Dunham was in Kenya on August 4,1961?
Did you see this post on Debbie’s site?
“As for the second matter of the incomplete or questionable ‘postmark’, I can speak with some authority on the subject as I was a postal employee for over 30 years from before 1970. This mark is created by a ‘round dater’ stamp. Each one was assigned to a specific employee and included an identifying number unique to the employee whose ‘round dater’ was used. That way, a ‘postmark’ could be traced back to its origin if a question of its authenticity ever came up. A ‘postmark’ was considered so reliable and sacrosanct that it could be used as evidence in court. This was an accountable item and was kept under lock and key at all times when it wasn’t in the possession of the individual authorized to have and use it and it was never allowed outside of the Post Office. It is a federal offense to postmark an item with any date other than the date on which the item was actually stamped. (There was a famous case where there was a contest to guess the final score for some athletic contest, a Superbowl or World Series, and the letters with the guesses had to be ‘postmarked’ prior to the event taking place. A group of postal employees conspired together and used a ‘round dater’ to illegally postmark their entries after the game was completed so they knew the score. They were caught and convicted.) Once the old ‘Post Office Department’ was reorganized into the new ‘USPS’ / U. S. Postal Service in the 1970’s, new ‘round daters’ would have been issued. Apparently someone in the Chicago machine has been able to find one of these obsolete stampers that was spirited out of the system from years ago and probably uses it when the need arises. The missing ‘19’ from the year ‘1980’ is probably because they don’t have the full set of numbers to change out the entire date or they weren’t familiar with the way the ‘round dater’ was used. Also, the employee’s identifying number is missing that would show to whom this particular ‘round dater’ was assigned.
It seems our only hope for a legitimate outcome to this travesty of justice is the Supreme Court or God himself. I’m not holding out much hope. We’ve been thwarted at every turn so far.”
I listed to quite a bit of the discussion. Basically, Debbie Schussel goes through the evidence that she posted on her website.
This really PROVES that Obama never registered for the draft in 1980, but that somebody filled out a fake registration form in 2008. The statute of limitations has run out on the first felony, failure to register. But do we really want a draft dodger as Commander in Chief? And the selective service people in Chicago managed to keep this back until just a few days before the election.
Second, the signature appears to be genuine—i.e., maybe Obama actually signed this forgery.
Third, Obama’s various statements about having registered for the draft, and the dates involved, strongly suggest that he knew about the forged certificate. That would be complicity in another felony, and the statute of limitations on that has NOT run out. There should, therefore, be an investigation into the matter by a special prosecutor.
But, of course, like clinton, Obama will control the Justice Department if he manages to worm his way into the White House.
This isn’t as serious as the forged COLB, but it does rise to the level of another felony, and it’s extremely disturbing since both these felonies were committed by Obama and his confederates in order to win the Presidency of the United States.
bookmark
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.