Posted on 11/24/2008 10:55:04 AM PST by AJKauf
On April 7, 1964, a 26-year-old detective in the New Orleans Police Department skipped up the steps into the Old Civil Courts building in New Orleans and presented himself to the Warren Commission investigating the assassination of President Kennedy.
I’d always known my father had been acquainted with Oswald. They had not only grown up half a block away from each other, but had shared homerooms at school. Sitting alphabetically, my old man Fred sat in front of Oswald for years. O’Sullivan next to Oswald.
Sifting through my Dad’s papers I came upon a letter from Jacqueline Kennedy thanking my father for appearing before the commission. It wasn’t something he spoke of often — just a tidbit of information in a life that went on to greater adventures. ...
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
Well, let's put it this way ... if everyone believed the Warren commission all of this JFK b.s. would have been put to bed 40 plus years ago.
ROTFL. SHHHhhhhh Don’t tell. As long as they are talking about Kennedy, they won’t be talking about Roswell.
Oh, by the way, I don’t see the problem with quoting myself alongside Voltaire, Einstein, or the God of the Old Testament, for that matter. For Pete’s sake, if I can’t quote myself on my own site, where *can* I quote myself?
Agree 100%. It is very clear to me. Even more compelling is a recent show on Discovery that reproduced the entire seen and even practiced shooting into ballistics gel from the same angle, etc. It really isn’t difficult to believe that one person did it.
But for Oswald to know about the route change that day, someone would have had to have told him in advance for him to have everything set up. At the least, it’s conspiracy but who else was involved even if they didn’t shoot at the President?
Jackie was trying to get out of the car to save her own rear! The first reports were that she was trying to help the SS guy into the car...but later, his report was he had to push her back into the car.
Jackie didn't have to chase his brain...it was all over her.
The Warren Commission probably didn't even have to walk very far down the street for that.
I mean, good thing that you think he did the shooting, but wow.
You either didn’t read or didn’t understand what I wrote about Oswald. Sorry, but I don’t have time to rewrite it.
______________
You posted that you don’t even know if Oswald is in on the “conspiracy” I understood it. I understand you cant’ dispute what I posted. You don’t have the intellectual capacity to post anything I won’t understand.
You believe in a forgery of the autopsy, you’re not sure if Oswald is in on the “conspiracy” or not. If you don’t know who’s in on the conspiracy, then you don’t even have any conclusions about who and or what killed Kennedy.
Your website is a joke, a total joke, you cite noted crackpots who make their living on the conspiracy crowd, not just limited to the JFK “conspiracy”.
You’re just like the 9/11 truthers who accuse others who won’t engage in your flights of fancy as lacking “reason” and not being nearly as enlightened as you.
You can’t answer any tough questions and when presented with contradictory evidence, science, etc., you just ignore the subject, you’re intellectually dishonest, won’t answer questions and cant dispute facts contradictory to your conspiracy, which you can’t explain.
Your website is really an embarrassment, it’s like the 8th graders guide to the conspiracy, a compilation of the coolest tidbits you could find. You’re too lazy to double check the stories you present as fact to see if they’ve been debunked. Your website will only appeal to your fellow nutters and conspiracy fans.
I’m a conspiracy fan, I love the stuff, I read a lot of it as fiction and enjoy it as such, JFK is one of my favorite paranoid black comedy farce movies.
If you’re lazy enough to believe Jim Marrs, etc., you’ll fall for anything, you have no BS filter, people who know better laugh at your website and read it as humor.
So you think the probability of aliens landing at Roswell is comparable to the probability of a second gunman in Dealy Plaza? Then you put one hell of a lot more stock in the Roswell theories than I do, dude.
I suggest you attempt to educate yourself on the physics of interstellar travel. While you’re at it, you might want to educate yourself about the conclusion of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, a major government investigation that concluded the existence of a second gunman in Dealy Plaza. Hilarious, eh?
OOPS! That was supposed to be a private reply, oh well. We’ll use our alternate screen names for future endeavors, they’ll never catch us.
Do us a favor and read the thread, your claims have been destroyed about a 1000 times, stop spouting conspiracy nonsense and crack open a book once in a while or watch a documentary.
Check my posts there are many videos you can watch and get somewhat up to speed, or you can continue to look silly to the folks who know something about the subject.
Heck, you can basically make up stuff and you’ll have defenders when it comes to this subject!
I said that whether Oswald was a shooter or a patsy is secondary to whether there was a second gunman. I don’t know whether Oswald was a shooter of a patsy, and I don’t really care much. I’ve even lead you to conclusive scientific proof of a second gunman, but you think it doesn’t exist simply because you choose to ignore it. You’re like an ostrich with its head in the sand, except that at least the ostrich doesn’t say such stupid things.
House Select Committee used flawed and since DISPROVEN sound evidence to conclude a conspiracy.
OBVIOUSLY, you don’t know that either!! Shocking, you just keep repeating lies.
Like I and others who know more than you have said, your website is an embarrassment, no better than a truther site, just a different subject.
“Jackie was trying to get out of the car to save her own rear! The first reports were that she was trying to help the SS guy into the car...but later, his report was he had to push her back into the car.”
That one takes the cake!
Oh, I see. But when you call people names, you use more sophisticated names, like “troll.”
And where did I say that all the quotes on my website are equally great? You pulled that one straight out of your rear end, just like the crap you are spewing about the JFK assassination.
You’re like an ostrich with its head in the sand, except that at least the ostrich doesn’t say such stupid things.
________________
You’ve insulted me since the beginning of this thread, it still doesn’t make the crap you post on your childish website true.
You quoting crackpots and calling it conclusive scientific proof, does not make it so. You’re like Captain Queeg and his “geometric logic”.
If your guy had ACTUAL” conclusive scientific proof”, the scientists and researchers would AGREE with him and it would be common knowledge by now, I guess that bit of “geometric logic” escapes you.
News flash genius, if you actually had “CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC PROOF” even the “opposition” would acknowledge it, many people are looking for the TRUTH, no matter where it leads.
If your “CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC PROOF” actually existed it would have been headline news for a long time now. It wouldn’t be just a small group of quacks and nuts who agree that it’s “CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC PROOF”
You’re a silly person spouting “conclusive scientific proof”, you don’t even understand what it means or you would be embarrassed to say it.
You and your website are a joke.
GarrisonOr
"This diagram indicates that the President's parade was supposed to continue on Main Street through the center of Dealey Plaza -- without even leaving Main." He stared at it in disbelief.
"So what's wrong with that?" I asked.
His finger was moving off of Main, inches downward to Elm until he found the Depository area where the President had been shot. "If that was the presidential parade route up there on Main . . . "
I finished the question for him. "How did he get way down here on Elm?"
Frank looked up at me with a slight frown, then looked back at the diagram. He moved his finger back along Main Street to where it reached Houston. "The motorcade turned right on Houston and went down onto Elm," he said. . . . "Here on Main Street, continuing through the open meadow," he said, "they couldn't have hit him. Are you telling me that at the last moment they just moved the President of the United States off of his scheduled route to here where the Depository is?"
It seems that the "changed motorcade route" is a factoid. It never happened. Evidence was wrenched out of context, and misinterpreted. Ironically, anyone who had read the Warren Commission Report would have known the truth. That volume discussed the parade route extensively (see below). It made it clear that you have to turn on Houston and then Elm to get from Dallas' Main Street to the Stemmons Freeway. If you try driving down Main, you can get to the Stemmons only by driving over a concrete divider strip. That would be illegal, absurdly undignified for the presidential limo, and impossible for the press busses that were a part of the motorcade.
My eyes tell me Jackie was trying to help the SS agent into the car to sheild the president - that’s his job. I see the agent reaching for Jackie’s hand, but the car speeds up and she turns away. Now I’m told she was retrieving invisable splattered brains from the trunk lid for reassembly at some secret facility no doubt. What am I to believe - the “retrieving brains theory” or my stinkin’ eyes?
There you go again. Ignore it and it doesn’t exist. Get the reference cited on my webpage (http://RussP.us/case.htm) and read the section by David Mantik, MD, PhD (physics). Scientific proof is not the same thing as “consensus,” and if you knew more than Al Gore knows about science you would know that.
You wouldn’t know scientific proof if it bit you on the ass. In fact, it has and you still don’t know it. Go ahead, live the rest of your life in abysmal ignorance. I won’t let your ignorance bother me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.