Replies

I think you may want to research Fletcher Prouty a bit more before you defend him, like the wacky things that came out of his mouth, not what other people said about him. Same for Jim Garrison.

So debunking theories with evidence, photographs and documented facts is “Intel, disinformation”.

By those standards, nothing is true, anything can be disinformation, it depends what the meaning of “is” is, etc. That is deconstruction on your part, you can dismiss any evidence pointing to Oswald as “disinformation”, what is real information and what is “disinformation”?

All of the evidence points to Oswald, all of the conspiracy theories contradict each other. This is the most investigated crime in the history of civilization and STILL the evidence points to Oswald. Tell me what you think happened 11/22/63.

I have read Fletcher Prouty’s books, and listened to his presentations, not much more I can do concerning him. Same with Jim Garrison. I rate their creditability miles higher than the MSM for sure.

Based on my research McAdams is pure disinformation using ‘disinformation’ of all kinds, and not the only one that does this.

My recommendation to research JFK would be the approach that was shown in the ‘Perry Mason’ TV series. The methods of investigation that the Mason character used to find the truth. Meaning for starters all the witnesses would have been called unlike the WC did. There were countless witnesses especially around the railroad yard/Knoll who the WC simply did not call. And the WC flipped witnesses who did not support the pre-fabricated line!

Take a look at the case that John Adams represented in the British soldiers firing on the colonists.

The length Adams went to get witness accounts of the event is what it took to find the truth, otherwise the soldiers would have been hung for the killings.

This kind of investigating did not happen in the JFK case as far as the Mainstream Media & Govt is concerned.

When Pearl Harbor & FDR were questioned it was the Govt & WWII veterans who investigated.

In the JFK assassination it was the ‘people’ who continued to investigate because of the poor job of the MSM/Govt.

So, some of the investigating public might be off but the majority of private researchers have done an excellent job finding the truth.

At this point my opinion would be LHO was certainly a patsy, and did not do the crime. As far as the assassination goes I believe it was ‘Intel’ planned, and delegated to the Mob/Cuban/Intel street community including foreign help contracted by the Mob.