Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5

Indeed, however if we look at Heller v DC, the NRA did not want that case moving forward in the court system, at the time they thought it was to much of a risk.

Things like that are a part of the reason why other groups exist Shooter 2.5, there is minority that will not support the NRA, but will support other organizations.

For myself, I understand why the NRA tries to mitigate the legislation that will pass, some folks, do not.


15 posted on 11/22/2008 3:51:01 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile...Rom 10.10..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: padre35

The NRA knew we were going to lose with the Supreme Court stacked against us. Remember, it was five years ago when Robert Levy started the case. Since Levy never even owned a gun, he had nothing to lose. Again, remember, Robert Levy is also on record for believing employers can tell you what you can carry in your personal vehicle and be fired no matter how many years you have on the job. The employees in question never had the opportunity to know about the policy change or the fact the employers can search their cars.

It was pure luck that President Bush was able to give us Roberts and Alito who are staunch Second Amendment supporters in the meantime.

Four Supreme Court Justices on the bench right this second have no idea how to read a twenty seven word sentence.

Four Supreme Court Justices on the bench right now don’t have the reading skills of a sixth grader.


16 posted on 11/22/2008 5:53:31 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson