Replies

I've enjoyed *all* of your posts, Frantzie. Your optimism and enthusiasm is catchy -- please keep it up!

My only concern with the SCOTUS justices would be a "feel good" decision. In other words, they *might* (stress that word because I don't think it is very likely) refuse to hear the case due to a sense of concern over the public morale. As soon as the thought of "civil war" enters the discussion, some might get a bit weak in the knees to do the right thing. Still, the fault for that feud rests with Obama and those complicit in his deception, not the Supreme Court. And the justices are rightfully protective of their position and of the Law. And, they will realize what a Pandora's Box is opened by permitting an ineligible candidate to ascend as POTUS. In a just and true society, the end result is clear and obvious.

I don’t know if they can pull off a feel good decision though. That is what is so important about Donofrio’s case. He holds an Ace. Roger Calero was on the ballot. Nina Wells certified it. I think Calero is what has to keep this from being any kind of feel good ruling or punting it. Because Donofrio took the proper steps through the NJ courts first.

>>> My only concern with the SCOTUS justices would be a “feel good” decision

I don’t think they’ll decide based upon what is popular, but what is Constitutionally-correct. IF they do side with what’s popular — “No justice, no peace!”

However, it’s scary to think: would the SCOTUS allowed this to happen, without review, if Leo hadn’t brought it up in the first place?!