Yet, they would be elect, by default, a candidate who embodies those things they abhor. funny, huh?
“Yet, they would be elect, by default, a candidate who embodies those things they abhor. funny, huh?”
What is worse, voting FOR a candidate such as you describe, simply because it has an “R” following it’s name or NOT taking a pro-active step to further the career of such an animal?
I don’t mean worse politically, I mean worse morally.
Somewhere on FR has been posted, a few times, the breakdown of voting patterns which indicated that socons actually turned out for McCain, it was fiscal conservatives who stayed home. That makes sense, as he has a pro-life record but voted for the bailout.